2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hemorrhagic Pyloroduodenal Duplication Cyst Misdiagnosed as Child Abuse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The median interval between initial presentation and definitive diagnosis and/or treatment was 17 months (range: 2 months to 12 years). One patient had had other operations before definitive diagnosis [13].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The median interval between initial presentation and definitive diagnosis and/or treatment was 17 months (range: 2 months to 12 years). One patient had had other operations before definitive diagnosis [13].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An intraoperative cystogram may be useful to rule out communication of the cyst with biliary and alimentary tracts [20]. Because of its rarity and variety in terms of clinical presentation and radiological findings, preoperative diagnosis is not always correct [13, 25, 33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La ubicación más común de estas lesiones es a nivel ileal, seguido por el yeyuno y el esófago; solo entre un 5 y un 7% de las duplicaciones se presentan a nivel duodenal 3 . Generalmente se encuentran en la primera o segunda porción del duodeno, siendo excepcional su localización a nivel piloroduodenal, con menos de 10 casos publicados en la literatura [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] .…”
Section: A H E a D O F P R I N T Introducciónunclassified