Abstract:Introduction
Partial nephrectomy (PN) has evolved into the surgical standard of care for localized renal lesions. Hemostatic agents (HA) support the surgeon in achieving local hemostasis during PN. We previously reported initial results with the HA Hemopatch
®
in PN. We now report our experiences with Hemopatch
®
in a larger and more challenging single-surgeon PN cohort.
Methods
Our study included 45 patients who und… Show more
“…HEMOPATCH is a sealing hemostat patch that has been used widely in different surgical elds such as Neurosurgery as dural sealant in cranial and spinal procedures, in pancreatic surgery in order to prevent postoperative pancreatic stula after distal pancreasectomy or in Urology to support the surgeon in achieving local hemostasis during partial nephrectomy or in cardiac surgery [25][26][27][28]. Its application in gynecology has not been evaluated by prospective studies, so we cannot have direct comparisons, except for the use of other topical hemostats, such as Floseal in Ovarian cystectomy, Tisseel and Floseal in laparoscopic myomectomy, and retrospective studies on hysterectomy for pathology benign [30,31].…”
Purpose: Uterine myomas are the most frequent gynecologic disease. In these cases, myomectomy is performed, traditionally laparotomically. However, alternatives have been widely used, including laparoscopic surgery, endoscopic and robotic surgery. During these techniques the diffuse parenchymatous bleeding remains one of the main intra and postoperative complications and sometime requires unplanned hysterectomies. Recently, hemostatic agents and sealants have been used to prevent excessive blood loss during surgical repair.Methods: We propose a prospective case-control study on the use of sealing hemostat patch (HEMOPATCH) on uterine sutures in laparotomic myomectomy. In the period between July 2016 to April 2017, 46 patients suffering from symptomatic uterine bromatosis underwent surgery. They were divided into 2 groups of 23 patients, with different treatment in the haemostatic phase of oozing bleeding: HEMOPATCH is applied in group A, spray electrocoagulation in group B.Results: In group A, we achieve faster hemostasis (p<0,05), than group B. We report a signi cantly lower PCR value in the 2 nd and 3 rd day postoperative for group A compared to group B. Conclusion: HEMOPATCH, during laparotomic myomectomy is a valid alternative solution for obtaining rapid hemostasis and consequently intraoperative and postoperative bleeding. Also, we suggest a lower in ammatory peritoneal state probably correlated to the barrier effect of the patch on the suture.
“…HEMOPATCH is a sealing hemostat patch that has been used widely in different surgical elds such as Neurosurgery as dural sealant in cranial and spinal procedures, in pancreatic surgery in order to prevent postoperative pancreatic stula after distal pancreasectomy or in Urology to support the surgeon in achieving local hemostasis during partial nephrectomy or in cardiac surgery [25][26][27][28]. Its application in gynecology has not been evaluated by prospective studies, so we cannot have direct comparisons, except for the use of other topical hemostats, such as Floseal in Ovarian cystectomy, Tisseel and Floseal in laparoscopic myomectomy, and retrospective studies on hysterectomy for pathology benign [30,31].…”
Purpose: Uterine myomas are the most frequent gynecologic disease. In these cases, myomectomy is performed, traditionally laparotomically. However, alternatives have been widely used, including laparoscopic surgery, endoscopic and robotic surgery. During these techniques the diffuse parenchymatous bleeding remains one of the main intra and postoperative complications and sometime requires unplanned hysterectomies. Recently, hemostatic agents and sealants have been used to prevent excessive blood loss during surgical repair.Methods: We propose a prospective case-control study on the use of sealing hemostat patch (HEMOPATCH) on uterine sutures in laparotomic myomectomy. In the period between July 2016 to April 2017, 46 patients suffering from symptomatic uterine bromatosis underwent surgery. They were divided into 2 groups of 23 patients, with different treatment in the haemostatic phase of oozing bleeding: HEMOPATCH is applied in group A, spray electrocoagulation in group B.Results: In group A, we achieve faster hemostasis (p<0,05), than group B. We report a signi cantly lower PCR value in the 2 nd and 3 rd day postoperative for group A compared to group B. Conclusion: HEMOPATCH, during laparotomic myomectomy is a valid alternative solution for obtaining rapid hemostasis and consequently intraoperative and postoperative bleeding. Also, we suggest a lower in ammatory peritoneal state probably correlated to the barrier effect of the patch on the suture.
“…There are similarities and differences between this series and the previously reported series of PEG-coated patch use in partial nephrectomy. 10 Surgical approach, technique with a hemostatic running suture in the defect base, and RENAL scores were similar. We did not use additional hemostatic agents and did not report any blood transfusion or intervention for bleeding.…”
Introduction: The Hemopatch® is a novel polyethylene glycol-coated (PEG-coated) collagen patch, which acts as a topical hemostatic agent. It has been applied to a variety of surgical techniques. Here, we present our series and technique using a PEG-coated patch for minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (MIPN).
Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patients undergoing MIPN by a single surgeon at a tertiary Canadian medical center between July and December 2018. We included patients if a PEG-coated patch was used to close the renal parenchymal defect. We also describe in detail our technique for laparoscopic patch deployment.
Results: A total of 17 patients met inclusion criteria, of whom 12 were male. Mean age was 63 years old. Median size of renal mass was 2.85 cm in largest dimension and median RENAL score was 6. Hilar clamping was carried out in 12 (70.9%) cases, with an average warm ischemic time of 16.1 minutes. The remainder of cases were performed off-clamp. Median estimated blood loss was 238 mL and the mean change in hemoglobin on postoperative day 1 compared to preoperatively was 21.2 g/L. The average length of stay was 1.76 days. No patient required blood transfusion or underwent angioembolization or re-operation for bleeding within 90 days. There were no Clavien-Dindo grade 3 or greater complication.
Conclusions: A PEG-coated patch can be used safely and effectively in lieu of traditional two-layer renorrhaphy with acceptable outcomes. Larger, prospective series are required to ascertain its true value and cost-effectiveness.
“…Hupe et al reported only a few bleeding events in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy using Hemopatch ® . Most of these procedures were performed as MIS [ 11 ]. Furthermore, Hemopatch® proved to be feasible and reliable in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy [ 7 ] and laparoscopic cholecystectomy [ 13 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several case series and smaller studies describe the effective and reliable use of Hemopatch ® in a variety of clinical applications, including solid organ, neurological, gastrointestinal, biliopancreatic, endocrine, urologic and cardiovascular procedures [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18].…”
Surgical procedures are often impeded by bleeding and/or leakage of body fluids. These complications cannot always be resolved by conventional surgical techniques. Hemopatch® is a hemostatic patch that also functions as a sealant. Here we document the effectiveness and safety of Hemopatch® for routine procedures of multiple surgical disciplines. To this end, we performed a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, observational registry study. Patients were eligible if they had received Hemopatch® during an open or minimally invasive procedure in one of these specialties: hepatobiliary, cardiovascular, urological, neurological/spinal, general, or lung surgery. Patients were excluded if they had a known hypersensitivity to bovine proteins or brilliant blue, intraoperative pulsatile or severe bleeding and/or infection at the target application site (TAS). The primary endpoint for intraoperative effectiveness was hemostasis assessed as the percentage of patients achieving hemostasis within 2 min and the percentage of patients achieving hemostasis without re-bleeding at the time of surgical closure. The registry enrolled 621 patients at 23 study sites in six European countries. Six hundred twenty patients had completed follow-up information. Hemostasis within 2 min was achieved at 463 (74.5%) of all 621 TASs. Hemostasis without re-bleeding was observed at 620 (99.8%) TASs. Adverse events were reported in 64 patients (10.3%). This Hemopatch® registry shows that Hemopatch® efficiently establishes hemostasis and sealing in a variety of surgical specialties, including minimally invasive procedures. Furthermore, we provide evidence for the safety of Hemopatch® across all the specialties included in the registry. This study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03392662.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.