1998
DOI: 10.1046/j.1423-0410.1998.7510073.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hemoglobin Determination in Blood Donors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To address this issue, we also compared predonation and postdonation venous results in a small group of donors. Consistent with other published reports, 9,10 we found that, during whole‐blood donation, Hct variably decreases by 0 to 4 units, with an average drop of 1.7 units. Given this approximate decrease of 2 Hct units during whole‐blood donation, the 6‐unit discrepancy reported here for predonation ES and postdonation venous Hct seems concordant with previous reports 4 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…To address this issue, we also compared predonation and postdonation venous results in a small group of donors. Consistent with other published reports, 9,10 we found that, during whole‐blood donation, Hct variably decreases by 0 to 4 units, with an average drop of 1.7 units. Given this approximate decrease of 2 Hct units during whole‐blood donation, the 6‐unit discrepancy reported here for predonation ES and postdonation venous Hct seems concordant with previous reports 4 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“… Sample site – earlobe‐stick blood has higher Hb values than finger‐stick blood, which are generally closer to venous blood Hb (Chambers & McGuff, 1989); Variations between Hb from different fingers (often over 10% –Boulton, Nightingale & Reynolds, 1994); Limitations because of methodology and performance variables (Walters & Garrity, 2000). Reported differences between capillary (finger‐stick) and venous blood Hb (Vuk et al ., 1998; Neufeld et al , 2002; Darragh et al , 2006) may be unreliable because each sample‐type was analysed on different apparatus calibrated separately; Environmental conditions at blood donation sessions may be associated with less reliable staff performance (Boulton et al , 2001); Seasonal variation – Hb can decrease by 2 g L −1 in summer over winter in temperate climes (Hoekstra et al , 2007; Sebok et al , 2007); Ethnicity – as commented above for Afro‐Americans and South‐East Asians; Age – Hb declines in men after the eighth decade; and whereas in women it rises following the menopause, it also declines after the eighth decade (White et al , 1993); Other physiological factors – posture, diurnal rhythms, prandial, altitude (or smoking), menstrual cycle stage, BMI etc. White et al , 1993 found higher BMI to be associated with higher Hb; this may not wholly be simply an artefact through sampling from obese arms. …”
Section: Haemoglobin Concentration (Hb) Thresholdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limitations because of methodology and performance variables (Walters & Garrity, 2000). Reported differences between capillary (finger‐stick) and venous blood Hb (Vuk et al ., 1998; Neufeld et al , 2002; Darragh et al , 2006) may be unreliable because each sample‐type was analysed on different apparatus calibrated separately;…”
Section: Haemoglobin Concentration (Hb) Thresholdsmentioning
confidence: 99%