2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2009.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hemoglobin A1c in predicting progression to diabetes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
17
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore Japanese studies showed an HbA1c ≥ 5.6% can predict T2DM in the shorter term, similar findings to results from the ARIC and WHS (Nakagami et al, 2010;Inoue et al, 2009;Inoue et al, 2008). A French cohort suggested the same prediction cut-point was from an HbA1c of ≥ 5.7 or 5.8% (Droumaguet et al, 2006).…”
Section: Hba1c To Predict Incident T2dmsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore Japanese studies showed an HbA1c ≥ 5.6% can predict T2DM in the shorter term, similar findings to results from the ARIC and WHS (Nakagami et al, 2010;Inoue et al, 2009;Inoue et al, 2008). A French cohort suggested the same prediction cut-point was from an HbA1c of ≥ 5.7 or 5.8% (Droumaguet et al, 2006).…”
Section: Hba1c To Predict Incident T2dmsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Six studies were based in Japan (Nakagami et al, 2010;Sato et al, 2009;Inoue et al, 2008;Inoue et al, 2007;Takahashi et al, 2006;Takahashi et al, 2010), five within US (although one study focused on Pima Indians only) (Pradhan et al, 2007;Selvin et al, 2010;Edelman et al, 2004;Little et al, 1994;Selvin et al, 2011), five from Europe (Droumaguet et al, 2006;Norberg et al, 2006;Kolberg et al, 2009;Chamnan et al, 2010;Cederberg et al, 2010) and two studies were conducted in China (Ko et al, 1999;Ko et al, 2000). Data was lacking in Hispanic, African and south Asian populations.…”
Section: Aimsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these studies the criterion for diagnosis of diabetes was an FPG value ≥ 7.0 mmol/L or diagnosis by physician. In a study based on the data obtained in the Funagata study, the optimal FPG cut-off value for IFG was found to be 5.36 mmol/L (96 or 97 mg/dL) [16]. In this study the diagnosis of diabetes was based on the results of an OGTT, and the diagnosis of diabetes may be more accurate than in the two previous Japanese studies, but the optimal FPG cut-off value was almost the same.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Several papers which investigated the IFG cutoff value on the basis of diabetes incidence among Japanese have been published recently [14][15][16]. In a study based on the health checkup data of 11,129 subjects, the optimal FPG cut-off value for IFG was determined to be 5.7 mmol/L (102 or 103 mg/dL) [14].…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation