2019 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/embc.2019.8856956
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hemodynamics Analysis of Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment During Working Memory Tasks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, the focus on non-invasive neuroimaging biomarkers for MCI and AD have shifted to functional connectivity. A recent systemic review including 36 articles over the past two decades suggests that patients with MCI and AD have impaired frontal and long-range connectivity in the resting state fMRI ( Yeung and Chan, 2020 ), which was also observed in a recent study ( Yoo and Hong, 2019 ). Task-related functional connectivity analysis suggests that the number and strength of prefrontal functional connections increased during a working memory task ( Yu et al, 2020 ) but left and inter-hemispheric connectivity during a verbal fluency test were lower ( Nguyen et al, 2019 ) in the patients with MCI compared to healthy controls.…”
Section: Clinical Application Of Fnirsmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More recently, the focus on non-invasive neuroimaging biomarkers for MCI and AD have shifted to functional connectivity. A recent systemic review including 36 articles over the past two decades suggests that patients with MCI and AD have impaired frontal and long-range connectivity in the resting state fMRI ( Yeung and Chan, 2020 ), which was also observed in a recent study ( Yoo and Hong, 2019 ). Task-related functional connectivity analysis suggests that the number and strength of prefrontal functional connections increased during a working memory task ( Yu et al, 2020 ) but left and inter-hemispheric connectivity during a verbal fluency test were lower ( Nguyen et al, 2019 ) in the patients with MCI compared to healthy controls.…”
Section: Clinical Application Of Fnirsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…However, the accuracy, on average 60-70%, has been too low to reliably identify MCI patients (Yang et al, 2019). Moreover, fNIRS has shown inconsistent results suggesting that patients with MCI have an increased oxyhemoglobin response in regions of interest compared with the healthy control group (Yoo and Hong, 2019). Therefore, the hemodynamic response detected by fNIRS is unlikely to be sensitive and specific enough for clinical practice.…”
Section: Mild Cognitive Impairmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21][22][23] There is evidence in the literature showing that fNIRS offers a great potential to become a valuable tool to identify individuals with a higher risk of developing dementia as changes in cortical haemodynamic obtained during a standardised cognitive test allow to discern between healthy and diseased individuals. [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] Young participants showed a stronger activation in the left hemisphere in the more difficult task conditions. Elderly participants showed no lateralisation and a decreased activation in the difficult task condition.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitations Of This Studymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Two studies observed blunted haemodynamic responses in MCI [39], [40], with a gradation from healthy controls to MCI to AD [24], whereas three found no difference in functional response [27], [41] or connectivity [31] between MCI and controls. Interestingly, one study identified hyperactivation in MCI compared to controls [42]. Perhaps the discriminatory ability of the n-back task is more subtle: there is evidence for differential WM load modulation across disease stages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such subject-specific information is also necessary for creating detailed topographical maps of brain activity using High-density Diffuse Optical Tomography (HD-DOT). Whilst no studies used HD-DOT and only a few studies used high-density systems (e.g., [27], [42]), Talamonti et al [82] used DOT and Li et al [59] performed source localisation of the NIRS signal, however, neither of these used subject-specific information. Moreover, many studies only analysed the HbO signal and discarded the HbR signal, citing a higher signal-to-noise ratio of the HbO signal and greater correlation with BOLD fMRI signal [95].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%