Jeffrey Uppington, MB, BS, FRCA A64-yr-old man presented for aortic valve replacement due to worsening aortic insufficiency (AI) associated with left ventricular (LV) dilation. He had a history of mitral valve replacement with a bi-leaflet mechanical St. Jude's valve 15 yr before this surgery. Preoperative transthoracic echocardiography showed 3-4ϩ AI and mitral regurgitation (MR) estimated to be 3ϩ. The ejection fraction was assessed as 60%. Cardiac catheterization demonstrated no significant coronary artery disease, AI 3-4ϩ, MR 1ϩ and an ejection fraction of 40%.Aortic valve replacement with possible aortic root replacement was planned. An intraoperative precardiopulmonary bypass transesophageal echocardiogram was requested by the surgeon to examine the mechanical mitral valve for signs of significant regurgitation requiring surgical treatment.During intraoperative transesophageal echocardiogram, the aortic valve was evaluated in the midesophageal aortic valve short-axis view and midesophageal aortic valve long-axis view. The right and noncoronary cusp of the aortic valve were thin and stretched and were prolapsing into the LV outflow tract. Central edges of the leaflets were thickened and mildly retracted with focal areas of calcification. The AI jet was eccentric, directed towards and under the mitral valve leaflets. It was estimated as 3-4ϩ based on over 6 mm width of the vena contracta, AI height/LV outflow tract diameter ratio of 70% and holosystolic retrograde flow in the descending aorta.The bi-leaflet prosthetic mitral valve leaflets could be well visualized in the midesophageal four-chamber view and appeared to be moving well and symmetrically. Color Doppler examination of the mitral valve in different midesophageal views demonstrated MR estimated as 1-2ϩ. On careful examination, we were able to distinguish systolic regurgitant jets consistent with expected mechanical valve backflow (washing jets) (Fig.