Abstract:Spironolactone with propranolol results in a better response with a greater reduction in hepatic venous pressure gradient in the secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding. A greater number of patients may be protected by this combination therapy than by propranolol alone. Hence, this combination may be recommended for secondary prophylaxis in patients with variceal bleeding.
“…A total of three studies comparing the RAAS inhibitor and β-blocker combination therapy with β-blocker monotherapy were included. In one study (8), the treated group was administered propranolol 40 mg bid and spironolactone 100 mg qd, while the control group was administered propranolol at a dose of 40 mg bid and a placebo tablet. Moreover, the dose of propranolol was gradually increased until there was a decrease in pulse rate of >20% from the baseline, or a pulse rate of 60 beats per minute was achieved.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretically, as RAAS inhibitors and β-blockers function via different mechanisms to decrease the pressure of portal veins, it is possible that the RAAS inhibitor and β-blocker combination therapy may lead to a more significant reduction in portal venous pressure. Several studies (8)(9)(10) have previously compared the RAAS inhibitor and β-blocker combination therapy vs. β-blocker monotherapy. However, the results remain inconsistent.…”
Section: Hemodynamic Effects Of Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone Inhibitmentioning
Abstract. β-blockers are commonly used for the treatment of acute variceal bleeding in cir rhosis. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone antagonists (angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers and aldosterone antagonists) are potential therapies for portal hypertension. Several studies have compared the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitor and β-blocker combination therapy vs. β-blocker monotherapy, with inconsistent results. The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy of the RAAS inhibitor and β-blocker combination therapy vs. β-blocker monotherapy for hepatic vein pressure gradient (HVPG) reduction in cirrhosis. Studies were obtained using PubMed, Embase, Medline and Cochrane library databases up to July 2015, and the weighted mean difference (WMD) in HVPG reduction was used as a measure of treatment efficacy. In total, three studies (91 patients) were included. When compared to the β-blocker monotherapy, the RAAS inhibitor and β-blocker combination therapy resulted in a significant HVPG reduction [WMD 1.70; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.52-2.88]. However, there was no significant difference in the heart rate reduction between the monotherapy and combination therapy groups (WMD -0.11; 95% CI: -3.51-3.29). In addition, no significant difference in the hemodynamic response was observed between the two groups (WMD 1.46; 95% CI: 0.93-2.30). In conclusion, the RAAS inhibitor and β-blocker combination therapy reduces portal hypertension significantly and to a greater extent than β-blocker monotherapy. Both therapies reduced the heart rate to similar levels; however, the RAAS inhibitor and β-blocker combination therapy reduced the mean arterial pressure to a greater extent. Due to the limited number of studies included, the data available do not allow a satisfactory comparison of adverse events. Moreover, further larger-scale trials are required in order to strengthen the results of the present study.
“…A total of three studies comparing the RAAS inhibitor and β-blocker combination therapy with β-blocker monotherapy were included. In one study (8), the treated group was administered propranolol 40 mg bid and spironolactone 100 mg qd, while the control group was administered propranolol at a dose of 40 mg bid and a placebo tablet. Moreover, the dose of propranolol was gradually increased until there was a decrease in pulse rate of >20% from the baseline, or a pulse rate of 60 beats per minute was achieved.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretically, as RAAS inhibitors and β-blockers function via different mechanisms to decrease the pressure of portal veins, it is possible that the RAAS inhibitor and β-blocker combination therapy may lead to a more significant reduction in portal venous pressure. Several studies (8)(9)(10) have previously compared the RAAS inhibitor and β-blocker combination therapy vs. β-blocker monotherapy. However, the results remain inconsistent.…”
Section: Hemodynamic Effects Of Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone Inhibitmentioning
Abstract. β-blockers are commonly used for the treatment of acute variceal bleeding in cir rhosis. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone antagonists (angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers and aldosterone antagonists) are potential therapies for portal hypertension. Several studies have compared the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitor and β-blocker combination therapy vs. β-blocker monotherapy, with inconsistent results. The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy of the RAAS inhibitor and β-blocker combination therapy vs. β-blocker monotherapy for hepatic vein pressure gradient (HVPG) reduction in cirrhosis. Studies were obtained using PubMed, Embase, Medline and Cochrane library databases up to July 2015, and the weighted mean difference (WMD) in HVPG reduction was used as a measure of treatment efficacy. In total, three studies (91 patients) were included. When compared to the β-blocker monotherapy, the RAAS inhibitor and β-blocker combination therapy resulted in a significant HVPG reduction [WMD 1.70; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.52-2.88]. However, there was no significant difference in the heart rate reduction between the monotherapy and combination therapy groups (WMD -0.11; 95% CI: -3.51-3.29). In addition, no significant difference in the hemodynamic response was observed between the two groups (WMD 1.46; 95% CI: 0.93-2.30). In conclusion, the RAAS inhibitor and β-blocker combination therapy reduces portal hypertension significantly and to a greater extent than β-blocker monotherapy. Both therapies reduced the heart rate to similar levels; however, the RAAS inhibitor and β-blocker combination therapy reduced the mean arterial pressure to a greater extent. Due to the limited number of studies included, the data available do not allow a satisfactory comparison of adverse events. Moreover, further larger-scale trials are required in order to strengthen the results of the present study.
“…All of the AA trials utilized spironolactone [10,40,[46][47][48]50,51]. Details regarding treatment and control medication doses and duration of administration are found in Table 3.…”
Section: Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three trials evaluated ACEi's [39,41,42], nine trials evaluated ARB's [6,[12][13][14][43][44][45]49] and seven trials evaluated AA's [10,40,[46][47][48]50,51].…”
Section: Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…criteria but since one trial expressed HVPG results as divided by moderate and severe portal hypertension, this trial was counted twice [12], bringing the final total of included studies to nineteen [6,10,[12][13][14][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51]. Three trials evaluated ACEi's [39,41,42], nine trials evaluated ARB's [6,[12][13][14][43][44][45]49] and seven trials evaluated AA's [10,40,[46][47][48]50,51].…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.