2002
DOI: 10.1053/ajkd.2002.29886
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hemodialysis vascular access survival: Upper-arm native arteriovenous fistula

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

18
174
6
9

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 267 publications
(207 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
18
174
6
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Only approximately 45% of AVF are functional without intervention after creation (32); the procedure rate is 1.45 (33) to 3.3 procedures per AVF required for maturation or 1.75 procedures per access year (32). Once an AVF is matured, the revision rate ranges from 0.17 to 0.57 (20,21,(73)(74)(75) and is required in approximately 50% of AVF (32,76). This contrasts to fewer interventions for graft maturation, whereas the revisions required for grafts per access year ranges between 0.44 and 1.80 (20,21,73,75,77) (typically three to six rimes greater than for AVF).…”
Section: Impact On the Patient: The Patient Is Firstmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Only approximately 45% of AVF are functional without intervention after creation (32); the procedure rate is 1.45 (33) to 3.3 procedures per AVF required for maturation or 1.75 procedures per access year (32). Once an AVF is matured, the revision rate ranges from 0.17 to 0.57 (20,21,(73)(74)(75) and is required in approximately 50% of AVF (32,76). This contrasts to fewer interventions for graft maturation, whereas the revisions required for grafts per access year ranges between 0.44 and 1.80 (20,21,73,75,77) (typically three to six rimes greater than for AVF).…”
Section: Impact On the Patient: The Patient Is Firstmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once an AVF is matured, the revision rate ranges from 0.17 to 0.57 (20,21,(73)(74)(75) and is required in approximately 50% of AVF (32,76). This contrasts to fewer interventions for graft maturation, whereas the revisions required for grafts per access year ranges between 0.44 and 1.80 (20,21,73,75,77) (typically three to six rimes greater than for AVF). In balance, whereas fistulas require up to three times more interventions for maturation, grafts can require up to six times more interventions for maintenance to achieve similar cumulative survival ( Figure 6).…”
Section: Impact On the Patient: The Patient Is Firstmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…arteriovenous fistula; hemodialysis; neointima THE ARTERIOVENOUS (A-V) fistula is the preferred type of vascular access for hemodialysis patients (29). It achieves higher patency rates, has fewer complications than synthetic grafts (12,29,31), and has a lower risk of infections than central venous catheters (17,29). Despite its advantages, A-V fistulae frequently fail to mature or become dysfunctional after successful dialysis sessions, and this occurs primarily due to the development of neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) within the A-V fistula circuit (2, 5, 39).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients were followed up for 1 yr, during which primary and secondary AVF patency rates were measured. T he low prevalence of the arteriovenous fistula (AVF) among US hemodialysis (HD) patients (1,2) has initiated nationwide measures to increase AVF creation and prevalence (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20). Among these are providing educational programs, setting forth guidelines and goals (3,4), implementing multidisciplinary approaches (4 -9), encouraging preoperative venous mapping (14 -19), and asking surgeons to create AVF instead of arteriovenous grafts (AVG) (10 -21).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%