2010
DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.49.3798
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hemodialysis is an Independent Predictor of Coronary In-stent Restenosis after Paclitaxel Eluting Stent Implantation

Abstract: Objective A drug eluting stent is often used for high-risk patients with complications such as diabetes mellitus (DM) and hemodialysis (HD), however the factors to predict restenosis after paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) placement have not been reported to date. Methods Between May 2007 and August 2009, 165 consecutive patients (231 stents) received PES in our hospital. Stent diameter and length were determined by the use of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). All patients continued to take 2 types of anti-platele… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…26 Recent data from a multi-center study in Japan using sirolimus-eluting stents emphasize the more than 2-fold higher rates of target lesion revascularization and more than 5-fold greater risk of cardiac mortality after adjustment for baseline characteristics and procedural characteristics in hemodialysis versus non-dialysis patients. 29 Hemodialysis has been consistently shown to be an independent risk factor for in-stent restenosis following placement of stents eluting sirolimus 28 and paclitaxel, 30 both first generation DES platforms. Finally, the pathophysiological factors underlying the process of accelerated atherosclerosis also predispose to stent thrombosis, a phenomenon of particular concern with DES, 16,31 which could also result in higher rates of myocardial infarction and mortality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 Recent data from a multi-center study in Japan using sirolimus-eluting stents emphasize the more than 2-fold higher rates of target lesion revascularization and more than 5-fold greater risk of cardiac mortality after adjustment for baseline characteristics and procedural characteristics in hemodialysis versus non-dialysis patients. 29 Hemodialysis has been consistently shown to be an independent risk factor for in-stent restenosis following placement of stents eluting sirolimus 28 and paclitaxel, 30 both first generation DES platforms. Finally, the pathophysiological factors underlying the process of accelerated atherosclerosis also predispose to stent thrombosis, a phenomenon of particular concern with DES, 16,31 which could also result in higher rates of myocardial infarction and mortality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diabetes mellitus and chronic renal failure (CRF) were significantly more prevalent in the restenosis group than in the non-restenosis group, which was in accordance with previous reports. 15, 16 Hypertension was also more prevalent in the restenosis group. Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics of the edge restenosis and the in-stent restenosis groups are shown in Table 2 and Table 3.…”
Section: Patient Populationmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…25,[38][39][40] Hemodialysis has been identified as an independent predictor of repeat target lesion revascularization after both sirolimus-(19.4% versus 6.6%; P,0.001) 31 and paclitaxel-eluting (odds ratio, 6.6; 95% CI, 2.34 to 18.6) stents 41 ; the newer generation of everolimus-eluting stents likely has lower in-stent restenosis rates. 42 Hemodialysis was an independent predictor of major adverse cardiovascular outcomes at 2 years after DES among patients with CKD 5D versus patients without CKD driven by higher mortality (12% versus 0.6%) and target vessel revascularization (24% versus 9%) rates.…”
Section: Des Versus Bms: Mortality and In-stent Restenosismentioning
confidence: 99%