Hemispheric specialisation in processing prosodic structures: Revisited

Walker, Judy Perkins; Daigle, Tracy; Buzzard, Melissa

doi:10.1080/02687030244000392

Cited by 30 publications

(24 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In the studies that were reviewed, mean illness duration ranged from 26.5 days [39] to 23 months [43]. The majority of studies had selected patients receiving some form of medication for the treatment of stroke [31,50,53]. Even among the studies that enrolled patients who were generally receiving medication, there may be substantial ‘on-off' variation depending on the time of day and when participants last took their medication.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These study stimuli were mostly drawn from the New York Emotion Battery (NYEB) database [27,43,44], and most studies varied in the use of emotional prosody sentences. Past studies have asked participants to identify or discriminate the recorded emotional prosody category of semantically neutral sentences [26,28,29,45,46,47], low-pass filtered sentences [48,49,50], sentence pairs [7,33,51,52], congruent or incongruent sentences [53], pseudo-sentences [30,41,54] or hummed utterances [55]. …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Review of Emotion Recognition in Stroke Patients

Yuvaraj

Murugappan

Norlinah

et al. 2013

Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: Patients suffering from stroke have a diminished ability to recognize emotions. This paper presents a review of neuropsychological studies that investigated the basic emotion processing deficits involved in individuals with interhemispheric brain (right, left) damage and normal controls, including processing mode (perception) and communication channels (facial, prosodic-intonational, lexical-verbal). Methods: An electronic search was conducted using specific keywords for studies investigating emotion recognition in brain damage patients. The PubMed database was searched until March 2012 as well as citations and reference lists. 92 potential articles were identified. Results: The findings showed that deficits in emotion perception were more frequently observed in individuals with right brain damage than those with left brain damage when processing facial, prosodic and lexical emotional stimuli. Conclusion: These findings suggest that the right hemisphere has a unique contribution in emotional processing and provide support for the right hemisphere emotion hypothesis. Significance: This robust deficit in emotion recognition has clinical significance. The extent of emotion recognition deficit in brain damage patients appears to be correlated with a variety of interpersonal difficulties such as complaints of frustration in social relations, feelings of social discomfort, desire to connect with others, feelings of social disconnection and use of controlling behaviors.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Review of Emotion Recognition in Stroke Patients

Yuvaraj

Murugappan

Norlinah

et al. 2013

Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Many studies have implicated the right hemisphere in the production and comprehension of prosody, specifically emotional prosody (e.g., Baum & Dwivedi, 2003;Pell, 2006;Ross, 1981;Walker, Daigle, & Buzzard, 2002). Recently, a few studies of treatment for production of emotional prosody have been published (Leon et al, 2005;Rosenbek et al, 2004;Stringer, 1996).…”

Section: Communication Deficits and Existing Treatment Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Perspectives on Treatment for Communication Deficits Associated With Right Hemisphere Brain Damage

Blake

2007

Am J Speech Lang Pathol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose To describe the current treatment research for communication (prosodic, discourse, and pragmatic) deficits associated with right hemisphere brain damage and to provide suggestions for treatment selection given the paucity of evidence specifically for this population. Method The discussion covers (a) clinical decision processes and evidence-based practice; (b) a review of right hemisphere communication deficits and existing treatment studies; (c) accounts of right hemisphere function, right hemisphere deficits, and theoretically motivated treatments; and (d) a guide for exploring and selecting treatments based on deficits rather than etiology. Conclusions Controlled treatment studies for communication deficits specifically for adults with right hemisphere brain damage are limited to aprosodia. For other communication deficits, clinicians may select treatments based on current theories of right hemisphere function and right hemisphere deficits, and/or treatments developed for other etiologies for which deficits are similar to those associated with right hemisphere damage.

show abstract

“…Consistent with previous perceptual (Perkins et al,. 1996;Walker et al, 2002) and production (Behrens, 1989;Seddoh, 2000;Shapiro & Danly, 1985) studies on left and right hemisphere damaged patients, this group performed significantly below normal on question identification only. This pattern of performance points to a deficit that might be related to the processing of component(s) of pitch contours or prosodic information that distinguish echo questions.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 46%

“…It is one of the elements of prosody, the nonsegmental components of spoken language (Couper-Kuhlen, 1986 variously that intonation disorder in aphasia may be due to underlying linguistic (Danly, Cooper, & Shapiro, 1983;Heilman, Bowers, Speedie, & Coslett, 1984;Perkins, Baran, & Gandour, 1996;Walker, Daigle, & Buzzard, 2002), phonetic-motoric (Cooper, Soares, Nicol, Michelow, & Goloskie, 1984;Danly & Shapiro, 1982;GraffRadford, Cooper, Colsher, & Damasio, 1986;Ryalls, 1982Ryalls, , 1984Seddoh, 2000) or temporal (Gandour, Petty, & Dardarananda, 1988;Gandour et al, 1992; see also Van Lancker & Sidtis, 1992) processing deficit. Studies that suggest primary linguistic involvement include those on perception (Heilman et al, 1984;Perkins et al, 1996;Walker et al, 2002) and production (Cooper et al, 1984;Danly & Shapiro, 1982;Danly et al, 1983). The possibility that aspects of intonation processing might be preserved following brain damage has also been reported for these patients Berndt, Salasso, Mitchum, & Blumstein, 1988;Seddoh, 2000;Walker, Fongemie, & Daigle, 2001).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Basis of intonation disturbance in aphasia: Perception

Seddoh

2006

Journal of Neurolinguistics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Hemispheric specialisation in processing prosodic structures: Revisited

Cited by 30 publications

References 26 publications

Review of Emotion Recognition in Stroke Patients

Review of Emotion Recognition in Stroke Patients

Perspectives on Treatment for Communication Deficits Associated With Right Hemisphere Brain Damage

Basis of intonation disturbance in aphasia: Perception

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About