Hemispheric differences in the processing of visual consequences of active vs. passive movements: a transcranial direct current stimulation study

Straube, Benjamin; Schülke, Rasmus; Drewing, Knut; Kircher, Tilo; Kemenade, Bianca M. van

doi:10.1007/s00221-017-5053-x

Cited by 13 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 48 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A large body of literature reporting sensory modulations in humans has focused on the auditory and tactile modalities (Blakemore et al, 1999;Baess et al, 2009;Lange, 2011;Weiss et al, 2011;Reznik et al, 2015b), with fewer studies characterizing this phenomenon in the visual domain (Cardoso-Leite et al, 2010;Straube et al, 2017;Yon and Press, 2017;Csifcsak et al, 2019). Thus our behavioral results provide an expansion of the current literature in the visual domain with respect to stimulus brightness.…”

supporting

confidence: 51%

Voluntary actions modulate perception and neural representation of action-consequences in a hand-dependent manner

Buaron

Reznik

Gilron

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Evoked neural activity in sensory regions, and perception of sensory stimuli, are modulated when the stimuli are the consequence of voluntary movement as opposed to an external source. It has been suggested that such modulations are due to efference copies of the motor command that are sent to relevant sensory regions during voluntary movement. Given the anatomical-functional laterality bias of the motor system, it is plausible that the pattern of such behavioral and neural sensory modulations will exhibit a similar bias, depending on the effector that was used to trigger the stimulus (e.g. right / left hand). Here we examined this issue in the visual domain using behavioral and neural measures (fMRI). Healthy participants judged the relative brightness of identical visual stimuli that were either self-triggered (using right or left hand button presses), or triggered by the computer. By presenting stimuli to either the right or left visual field, we biased visual-evoked responses to left / right visual cortex.We found stronger perceptual modulations when the triggering hand was ipsi (rather than contra) lateral to the stimulated visual field. At the neural level, we found that despite identical physical properties of the visual consequence, evoked fMRI responses in right and left visual cortices differentiate the identity of the triggering hand (left / right). Our findings support a model in which voluntary actions induce sensory modulations that follow the anatomical-functional bias of the motor system.

show abstract

supporting

confidence: 51%

Voluntary actions modulate perception and neural representation of action-consequences in a hand-dependent manner

Buaron

Reznik

Gilron

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This previous study concluded that the left angular gyrus was a supramodal comparator area in action-outcome monitoring, as significant activity was observed in the left angular gyrus not only during visual feedback but also during the detection of delayed auditory feedback, further suggesting that the left angular gyrus and connected frontal processes are specifically relevant for the comparison of predicted and perceived time points of the consequences of visual actions (146). Straube et al (147) showed that transcranial direct current anodal stimulation to the left frontal-parietal regions (left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and left angular gyrus) significantly improved the detection of delayed visual feedback for self-initiated movements compared to cathodal stimulation. In contrast, cathodal stimulation to the left frontal-parietal (and anodal stimulation to the right frontal-parietal) provided a benefit to the detection of delay in visual feedback for passive movements.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In contrast, cathodal stimulation to the left frontal-parietal (and anodal stimulation to the right frontal-parietal) provided a benefit to the detection of delay in visual feedback for passive movements. This previous study concluded that the frontal-parietal network of the left hemisphere has a more important role than the right hemisphere in the generation of motor predictions and for the comparison of predicted and perceived time points of sensory information (147). These previous studies provided evidence that directly supports the current results.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Distortion of Visuo-Motor Temporal Integration in Apraxia: Evidence From Delayed Visual Feedback Detection Tasks and Voxel-Based Lesion-Symptom Mapping

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Limb apraxia is a higher brain dysfunction that typically occurs after left hemispheric stroke and its cause cannot be explained by sensory disturbance or motor paralysis. The comparison of motor signals and visual feedback to generate errors, i.e., visuo-motor integration, is important in motor control and motor learning, which may be impaired in apraxia. However, in apraxia after stroke, it is unknown whether there is a specific deficit in visuo-motor temporal integration compared to visuo-tactile and visuo-proprioceptive temporal integration. We examined the precision of visuo-motor temporal integration and sensory-sensory (visuo-tactile and visuo-proprioception) temporal integration in apraxia after stroke by using a delayed visual feedback detection task with three different conditions (tactile, passive movement, and active movement). The delay detection threshold and the probability curve for delay detection obtained in this task were quantitative indicators of the respective temporal integration functions. In addition, we performed subtraction and voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping to identify the brain lesions responsible for apraxia and deficits in visuo-motor temporal integration. The behavioral experiments showed that the delay detection threshold was extended and that the probability curve for delay detection was less steep in apraxic patients compared to controls (pseudo-apraxic patients and unaffected patients), only for the active movement condition, and not for the tactile and passive movement conditions. Furthermore, the severity of apraxia was significantly correlated with the delay detection threshold and the steepness of the probability curve in the active movement condition. These results indicated that multisensory (i.e., visual, tactile, and proprioception) feedback was normally temporally integrated, but motor prediction and visual feedback were not correctly temporally integrated in apraxic patients. That is, apraxic patients had difficulties with visuo-motor temporal integration. Lesion analyses revealed that both apraxia and the distortion of visuo-motor temporal integration were associated with lesions in the fronto-parietal motor network, including the left inferior parietal lobule and left inferior frontal gyrus. We suppose that damage to the left inferior fronto-parietal network could cause deficits in motor prediction for visuo-motor temporal integration, but not for sensory-sensory (visuo-tactile and visuo-proprioception) temporal integration, leading to the distortion of visuo-motor temporal integration in patients with apraxia.

show abstract

“…Social cognition is a particularly relevant domain of interest given connections with functioning and overall quality of life ( Green et al, 2015 ). Much of what is known about the effects of tDCS on social cognition stems from studies of healthy individuals ( Santiesteban et al, 2012 ; Khalighinejad and Haggard, 2015 ; Khalighinejad et al, 2016 ; Mai et al, 2016 ; Schülke and Straube, 2017 ; Straube et al, 2017 ). Social cognition, distinctly different from neurocognitive processes, has been described as the ability to develop mental representations about oneself, others, and interactions between the two ( Adolphs, 2001 ; Fett et al, 2011 ).…”

Section: Studies Evaluating the Efficacy Of Tdcs On Influencing Cognimentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The current review discusses (1) recent findings exploring the impacts of tDCS on symptoms and cognition among schizophrenia populations ( Fröhlich et al, 2016 ; Palm et al, 2016 ), (2) tDCS and other neuromodulatory techniques ( Hasan et al, 2016 ; Hopfinger et al, 2017 ; Mellin et al, 2018 ), (3) tDCS and neuroimaging ( Mondino et al, 2016 ; Palm et al, 2016 ), (4) tDCS in conjunction with cognitive remediation ( Orlov et al, 2017 ), and (5) tDCS and the impacts on antipsychotic medication use ( Agarwal et al, 2016 ). Furthermore, other populations are also discussed including relevant studies in healthy individuals ( Khalighinejad and Haggard, 2015 ; Khalighinejad et al, 2016 ; Mai et al, 2016 ; Schülke and Straube, 2017 ; Straube et al, 2017 ), childhood onset schizophrenia ( Mattai et al, 2011 ), and non-clinical psychosis ( Gupta et al, 2017 ). The following qualitative review summarizes the current literature and offers future directions, taking recent findings into account, for tDCS research in schizophrenia populations.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, Symptomatology, and Cognition in Psychosis: A Qualitative Review

Gupta

Kelley

Pelletier-Baldelli

et al. 2018

Front. Behav. Neurosci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Schizophrenia is a chronic, debilitating condition that affects approximately 1% of the population. Individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia typically exhibit positive (e.g., hallucinations) and negative symptoms (e.g., anhedonia) and impairments in cognitive function. Given the limitations of antipsychotic medication and psychotherapy in fully treating psychosis symptomatology, there has been increasing interest in other interventions such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). tDCS is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique, that is safe, cost-effective, and widely accessible. Here, we discuss treatment studies that seek to improve symptoms and cognitive performance in schizophrenia using tDCS. Currently within the literature, there is support for reductions in positive symptoms such as hallucinations after receiving tDCS. Further, studies indicate that tDCS can improve cognitive functioning, which is an area of investigation that is sorely needed, as it is unclear which types of interventions may be useful in ameliorating cognitive deficits among this group. Taken together, the evidence suggests that tDCS holds promise in improving symptoms and cognition. To that end, tDCS has critical clinical implications for this population.

show abstract

Hemispheric differences in the processing of visual consequences of active vs. passive movements: a transcranial direct current stimulation study

Cited by 13 publications

References 48 publications

Voluntary actions modulate perception and neural representation of action-consequences in a hand-dependent manner

Voluntary actions modulate perception and neural representation of action-consequences in a hand-dependent manner

Distortion of Visuo-Motor Temporal Integration in Apraxia: Evidence From Delayed Visual Feedback Detection Tasks and Voxel-Based Lesion-Symptom Mapping

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, Symptomatology, and Cognition in Psychosis: A Qualitative Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About