2013
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hemispheric Differences in Corticospinal Excitability and in Transcallosal Inhibition in Relation to Degree of Handedness

Abstract: In this study, we examined hemispheric differences in corticospinal excitability and in transcallosal inhibition in a selected group of young adults (n = 34) grouped into three handedness categories (RH: strongly right-handed, n = 17; LH: strongly left-handed, n = 10; MH: mixed-handed, n = 7) based on laterality quotients (LQ) derived from the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory. Performance measures were also used to derive a laterality index reflecting right-left asymmetries in manual dexterity (Dextli) and in fi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
32
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(43 reference statements)
5
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, various reports indicate that left-handers have reduced hemispheric lateralization and hence, the differences between populations varying in handedness might be complex (Solodkin et al, 2001). Regarding CS excitability at rest, for example, it seems unlikely that left-handers will show increased excitability in the right hemisphere since previous studies have reported a lower intensity required to reach rMT in M1 LEFT , relative to M1 RIGHT , in left- and right-handers (Davidson and Tremblay, 2013). Future assessment of left handers would allow a fuller characterization of the hemispheric similarities and differences in motor preparation and implementation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, various reports indicate that left-handers have reduced hemispheric lateralization and hence, the differences between populations varying in handedness might be complex (Solodkin et al, 2001). Regarding CS excitability at rest, for example, it seems unlikely that left-handers will show increased excitability in the right hemisphere since previous studies have reported a lower intensity required to reach rMT in M1 LEFT , relative to M1 RIGHT , in left- and right-handers (Davidson and Tremblay, 2013). Future assessment of left handers would allow a fuller characterization of the hemispheric similarities and differences in motor preparation and implementation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One approach here has been to examine corticospinal (CS) excitability at rest, comparing motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by stimulation over the primary motor cortex of left or right hemisphere (M1 LEFT and M1 RIGHT respectively) (Davidson and Tremblay, 2013; Hammond et al, 2004). The results from this literature are inconsistent (Barber et al, 2012; Serrien et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is also possible that the corpus callosum serves to allow one hemisphere to inhibit processing within the other (Chiarello & Maxfield, 1996). A recent transcranial magnetic stimululation (TMS) study found evidence for more rapid transcallosal inhibition of motor cortex for mixed/weak as compared to strong/consistent handers (Davidson & Tremblay, 2013). It is unclear whether such findings can be generalized to other, more cognitive domains, but if weak handers have increased transcallosal inhibition a potential structural correlate of this might still be greater callosal volume for this group, an effect we did not observe.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is posited that mixed/weak handers rely on greater crosstalk across hemispheres, and increased access to right hemisphere processes, than do consistent/strong handers (Prichard et al, 2013). Surprisingly, very little neurobiological evidence has been gathered to support this conjecture (but see Davidson & Tremblay, 2013). Instead, degree of handedness is used as a proxy variable for the extent of hemispheric interaction (Lyle & Orsborn, 2011; Sontam & Christman, 2012; Sontam et al, 2009) – that is, such handedness differences are taken as the evidence of variations in interhemispheric interaction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The procedures for TMS and MEP recordings has been described in details elsewhere [7,29]. Briefly, MEPs were recorded with participants comfortably seated using surface electrodes (DE-2.1, Delsys Inc., Boston, MA, USA) placed in a belly-tendon montage over the right first dorsal interosseous (FDI).…”
Section: Tms and Recordings Of Mepsmentioning
confidence: 99%