1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(98)80025-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hemisphere versus hemiellipse: when is each most accurate for proximal isovelocity calculation of regurgitant flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These modifications could be either a multiplane evaluation of the PISA shape or a direct three-dimensional (3D) quantification. [13][14][15][16] However, calculations require many measurements or an offline analysis, which can be timeconsuming, making it difficult to perform in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to test in vitro, with an in vivo validation, the accuracy of the PISA method depending on the shape and number of regurgitant flows, as well as the modification of the formula, allowing for a more precise assessment with simple and accessible measurements.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These modifications could be either a multiplane evaluation of the PISA shape or a direct three-dimensional (3D) quantification. [13][14][15][16] However, calculations require many measurements or an offline analysis, which can be timeconsuming, making it difficult to perform in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to test in vitro, with an in vivo validation, the accuracy of the PISA method depending on the shape and number of regurgitant flows, as well as the modification of the formula, allowing for a more precise assessment with simple and accessible measurements.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may underestimate the severity of MR if inappropriate assumptions are chosen. 5,17,23 Although its formula is further improved for specific MR geometries (oblong MR, multiple jets MR), 25,42 the PISA method is mainly based on a valve evaluation.…”
Section: Clinical Impact: See Beyond the Mitral Valvementioning
confidence: 99%