2003
DOI: 10.1080/00207450390220358
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hemifield Memory for Attractiveness

Abstract: In order to determine whether or not facial attractiveness plays a role in hemispheric facial memory, 35 right-handed participants first assigned attractiveness ratings to faces and then performed a recognition test on those faces in the left visual half-field (LVF) and right visual half-field (RVF). We found significant interactions between the experimental factors and visual half-field. There were significant differences in the extreme ends of the rating scale, that is, the very unattractive versus the very … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is not what was found. Unlike the present study, previous publications from this laboratory used ordinary faces as stimuli in experiments on the functional (a)symmetry status of the face (Chen et al, 1997;Deblieck & Zaidel, 2003;Reis & Zaidel, 2001;Zaidel et al, 2003;Zaidel, et al, 1995). The previous findings revealed lateral facial organization for attractiveness, particularly in faces of women.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 43%
“…This is not what was found. Unlike the present study, previous publications from this laboratory used ordinary faces as stimuli in experiments on the functional (a)symmetry status of the face (Chen et al, 1997;Deblieck & Zaidel, 2003;Reis & Zaidel, 2001;Zaidel et al, 2003;Zaidel, et al, 1995). The previous findings revealed lateral facial organization for attractiveness, particularly in faces of women.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 43%
“…However, they have brought mixed results. Whereas some researchers reported more accurate memory for attractive stimuli (e.g., Cross et al, 1971 ; Allan et al, 2012 ; Kajimura et al, 2014 ), others found the opposite ( Light et al, 1981 ; Sarno and Alley, 1997 ; Wiese et al, 2014 ), some did not obtain a difference in memory accuracy ( Brigham, 1990 ; Wickham and Morris, 2003 ; Anderson et al, 2010 ) and others obtained a mixture of both ( Deblieck and Zaidel, 2003 ). It also seems that, compared with males, females are better at remembering same-sex faces when faces of both sexes are presented ( Rehnman and Herlitz, 2007 ; Wang, 2013 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attractiveness has been found to influence not only social judgments but also memory for faces. Research has demonstrated high facial recognition for attractive faces (Cross, Cross & Daly, 1971; Deblieck & Zaidel, 2003; Marzi & Viggiano, 2010), although other research failed to do so probably due to differences regarding characteristics of faces or methodology (Light, Hollander & Kayra‐Stuart, 1981; Wickham & Morris, 2003; Wiese, Altmann & Schweinberger, 2014). However, and based on this research, we investigated whether attractiveness influences destination memory, that is, the ability to remember to whom information was previously told (Gopie, Craik & Hasher, 2010; Gopie & Macleod, 2009; Koriat, Ben‐Zur & Sheffer, 1988).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%