Abstract:Autologous hematopoietic stem cell (HSC)-targeted gene therapy provides a one-time cure for various genetic diseases including sickle cell disease (SCD) and β-thalassemia. SCD is caused by a point mutation (20A > T) in the β-globin gene. Since SCD is the most common single-gene disorder, curing SCD is a primary goal in HSC gene therapy. β-thalassemia results from either the absence or the reduction of β-globin expression, and it can be cured using similar strategies. In HSC gene-addition therapy, patient CD… Show more
“…One of the key studies demonstrating the clinical potential of CRISPR-Cas9 for treating sickle cell anemia was conducted by Germino-Watnick et al 47 In this study, hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) were obtained from sickle cell anemia patients and subjected to CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing to correct the mutation in the β-globin gene. The edited HSPCs were then infused back into the patients, aiming to restore normal red blood cell function.…”
Section: Sickle Cell Anemiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Germino-Watnick et al 47 Editing hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) to treat Sickle Cell Anemia CRISPR-Cas9's therapeutic promise in treating sickle cell anemia.…”
Introduction CRISPR–Cas9 gene editing, leveraging bacterial defense mechanisms, offers precise DNA modifications, holding promise in curing genetic diseases. This review critically assesses its potential, analyzing evidence on therapeutic applications, challenges, and future prospects. Examining diverse genetic disorders, it evaluates efficacy, safety, and limitations, emphasizing the need for a thorough understanding among medical professionals and researchers. Acknowledging its transformative impact, a systematic review is crucial for informed decision-making, responsible utilization, and guiding future research to unlock CRISPR–Cas9's full potential in realizing the cure for genetic diseases.
Methods A comprehensive literature search across PubMed, Scopus, and the Web of Science identified studies applying CRISPR–Cas9 gene editing for genetic diseases, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Inclusion criteria covered in vitro and in vivo models targeting various genetic diseases with reported outcomes on disease modification or potential cure. Quality assessment revealed a generally moderate to high risk of bias. Heterogeneity prevented quantitative meta-analysis, prompting a narrative synthesis of findings.
Discussion CRISPR–Cas9 enables precise gene editing, correcting disease-causing mutations and offering hope for previously incurable genetic conditions. Leveraging inherited epigenetic modifications, it not only fixes mutations but also restores normal gene function and controls gene expression. The transformative potential of CRISPR–Cas9 holds promise for personalized treatments, improving therapeutic outcomes, but ethical considerations and safety concerns must be rigorously addressed to ensure responsible and safe application, especially in germline editing with potential long-term implications.
“…One of the key studies demonstrating the clinical potential of CRISPR-Cas9 for treating sickle cell anemia was conducted by Germino-Watnick et al 47 In this study, hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) were obtained from sickle cell anemia patients and subjected to CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing to correct the mutation in the β-globin gene. The edited HSPCs were then infused back into the patients, aiming to restore normal red blood cell function.…”
Section: Sickle Cell Anemiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Germino-Watnick et al 47 Editing hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) to treat Sickle Cell Anemia CRISPR-Cas9's therapeutic promise in treating sickle cell anemia.…”
Introduction CRISPR–Cas9 gene editing, leveraging bacterial defense mechanisms, offers precise DNA modifications, holding promise in curing genetic diseases. This review critically assesses its potential, analyzing evidence on therapeutic applications, challenges, and future prospects. Examining diverse genetic disorders, it evaluates efficacy, safety, and limitations, emphasizing the need for a thorough understanding among medical professionals and researchers. Acknowledging its transformative impact, a systematic review is crucial for informed decision-making, responsible utilization, and guiding future research to unlock CRISPR–Cas9's full potential in realizing the cure for genetic diseases.
Methods A comprehensive literature search across PubMed, Scopus, and the Web of Science identified studies applying CRISPR–Cas9 gene editing for genetic diseases, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Inclusion criteria covered in vitro and in vivo models targeting various genetic diseases with reported outcomes on disease modification or potential cure. Quality assessment revealed a generally moderate to high risk of bias. Heterogeneity prevented quantitative meta-analysis, prompting a narrative synthesis of findings.
Discussion CRISPR–Cas9 enables precise gene editing, correcting disease-causing mutations and offering hope for previously incurable genetic conditions. Leveraging inherited epigenetic modifications, it not only fixes mutations but also restores normal gene function and controls gene expression. The transformative potential of CRISPR–Cas9 holds promise for personalized treatments, improving therapeutic outcomes, but ethical considerations and safety concerns must be rigorously addressed to ensure responsible and safe application, especially in germline editing with potential long-term implications.
“…Several gene targets involved in regulating the β-globin gene or γ-globin (forming fetal Hb, abbreviated as HbF), which has anti-sickling effects, have been proposed and proved useful [ 177 , 178 ]. One of the employed strategies is gene addition by lentivirus in patient CD34 + HSCs that are widely tested in clinical trials and reviewed elsewhere [ 179 ].…”
Section: Ex Vivo
Editing In Somatic Cellsmentioning
Advancements in genome editing enable permanent changes of DNA sequences in a site-specific manner, providing promising approaches for treating human genetic disorders caused by gene mutations. Recently, genome editing has been applied and achieved significant progress in treating inherited genetic disorders that remain incurable by conventional therapy. Here, we present a review of various programmable genome editing systems with their principles, advantages, and limitations. We introduce their recent applications for treating inherited diseases in the clinic, including sickle cell disease (SCD), β-thalassemia, Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA), heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH), etc. We also discuss the paradigm of ex vivo and in vivo editing and highlight the promise of somatic editing and the challenge of germline editing. Finally, we propose future directions in delivery, cutting, and repairing to improve the scope of clinical applications.
“…In gene addition, normal HbA is introduced via lentiviral vectors to SCA patients in order to compensate the reduced oxygen-carriage function of HbS so that new (HbA) and old (HbS) are co-present with near-normal therapeutic status. This mode of gene therapy is realized to be one-time cure of SCA and safer than other methods [9]. Likewise, in gene editing technology the mutated HbS within hematopoietic stem cells is genetically engineered ex vivo and then returned back to the body [10].…”
Section: Figure 1 Different Hb Inherited Genotypes and Their Consequt...mentioning
Sickle cell anemia (SCA) is the almost the severest hemoglobinopathy known with no cure till date. Patients with SCA has a shorter lifespan and suffer from painful crises and end-organ damages. The goal of this in silico work is to find the consensus miRNAs targeting KLF1 gene, responsible for HbF-to-HbA switching followed by generating the corresponding miRNA sponge for gene silencing purposes. 3 publicly available databases were searched, miRDB, miRWalk and TargetScan. Afterwards, the hybridization examination of the predicted miRNAs was evaluated. Finally, the design of miRNA sponge as a means to target miRNA was performed. In conclusion, hsa-miR-330-5p was the best miRNA targeting KLF1 gene in many aspects and its miRNA sponge sequence was provided.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.