The optimal induction for older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is unknown. Several anthracyclines have been proposed, but the data remain equivocal. Additionally, few prospective trials of priming with hematopoietic growth factors to cycle leukemia cells prior to induction chemotherapy have been conducted. Three hundred and sixtytwo older adults with previously untreated AML were randomized to either daunorubicin, idarubicin or mitoxantrone with a standard dose of cytarabine as induction therapy. In addition, 245 patients were also randomized to receive granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) or placebo beginning 2 days prior to induction chemotherapy and continuing until marrow aplasia. No difference was observed in the disease-free overall survival or in toxicity among patients receiving any of the 3 induction regimens or among those receiving growth factor or placebo for priming. However, the complete remission rate for the first 113 analyzable patients, who did not participate in the priming study and started induction therapy 3 to 5 days earlier than those who did, was significantly higher (50% versus 38%; P ؍ .03). None of the anthracyclines is associated with improved outcome in older adults. Priming with hematopoietic growth factor did not improve response when compared with placebo. Furthermore, delaying induction therapy in older adults may lead to a lower complete remission rate.
IntroductionA combination of an anthracycline and a cytarabine is the most commonly used induction regimen in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, neither the best anthracycline nor the optimal dose has been established. Classic studies 2 decades ago established a standard induction regimen of 45 mg/m 2 daunorubicin intravenously for 3 days and 100 mg/m 2 cytarabine intravenously by continuous infusion for 7 days. 1-5 For patients younger than 55 to 60 years, multiple prospective randomized studies compared daunorubicin at a dose of 45 mg/m 2 with idarubicin, amsacrine, aclacinomycin A, and mitoxantrone, while keeping the dose of cytarabine constant. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] Virtually all of these agents were at least as effective as, if not better than, daunorubicin at a dose of 45 mg/m 2 . However, the results for patients older than 55 to 60 years are equivocal and do not confirm the superiority of any anthracycline when compared with 45 mg/m 2 daunorubicin. 9,15 In this prospective randomized study, older adults received either daunorubicin, idarubicin, or mitoxantrone, each combined with the identical dose of cytarabine.Priming with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) or granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) may modulate cell cycle kinetics of leukemic blasts and render them more susceptible to phase-specific agents such as cytarabine. 16 In this prospective trial, patients were also randomized to receive GM-CSF or placebo prior to induction therapy to determine the effect that induction therapy for AML had on efficacy and toxicity. Correlative labora...