2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2014.11.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Helsinki score—a novel model for prediction of metastases in adrenocortical carcinomas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
113
0
8

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
113
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The novel Helsinki score introduced by the authors2 was also determined. The Helsinki score includes 3 × mitotic rate (>5/50 high-power field)+5 × presence of necrosis + proliferation index (Ki67/mib-1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The novel Helsinki score introduced by the authors2 was also determined. The Helsinki score includes 3 × mitotic rate (>5/50 high-power field)+5 × presence of necrosis + proliferation index (Ki67/mib-1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various histopathological criteria differentiate adrenocortical carcinomas from adenomas; the most common is the Weiss scoring system 1. Recently, we described the Helsinki score, a more objective and accurate tool to evaluate these tumours’ metastatic potential 2. Biomarkers reflecting the malignant potential of the tumour could further contribute to clinicopathological diagnosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different more simplified algorithms have been proposed with only the most reliable parameters included (Aubert et al 2002). Pennanen et al (2015) recently developed the Helsinki score, which consists of the sum of 3! mitotic rateC5!…”
Section: Current Tools To Diagnose Accsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these reasons, a new scoring system (Helsinki score) was recently introduced, which is based on the combined evaluation of morphological parameters (necrosis and mitotic index >5/50 high-power fields) and of the Ki67 labeling index (LI) (see below). This system was shown to be able to predict the metastatic potential of ACC with very high sensitivity and specificity (Pennanen et al 2015). Another very recent study extended and confirmed the prognostic validity of the Helsinki score on a larger series of ACC cases (Duregon et al 2017).…”
Section: Histopathological Evaluation Of Malignancy In Act: Around Anmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…A recent large multicentric ENS@T study has shown that the KI67 LI is a very reliable parameter to predict disease recurrence (disease-free survival, DFS) and overall survival (OS) in ACC patients after complete tumor resection . Furthermore, Ki67 LI integration with morphological parameters in the newly introduced Helsinki score makes it to outperform the Weiss system as a prognostic indicator in ACC (see above) (Pennanen et al 2015, Duregon et al 2017. However, a limitation of the Ki67 LI consists in difficulties in its standardization and reproducibility when applied to many tumor types, including ACC (Papathomas et al 2016).…”
Section: Immunohistochemical Markers Improve Prognostic Assessment Inmentioning
confidence: 99%