1987
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1987.tb00427.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Helping: The Influence of Anticipated Social Sanctions and Self‐Monitoring

Abstract: A field experiment was conducted to examine the influence of social sanctions and self-monitoring on willingness to help handicapped persons Compared to low self-monitonng individuals, those high in self-monitorlng tendencies were more likely to offer help if told that significant social rewards were attached to the act of helping, but were less likely to help if led to believe that these consequences were weak Implications for research on helping and self-monitonng are considered with particular attention bei… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, observers were not particularly proficient in gauging the level of Agreeableness of those who are high in self-monitoring. Therefore, our results are consistent with previous studies showing that high self-monitors are driven by social rewards such that they exhibit different levels of Agreeableness-diagnostic behaviors in response to situational demands, which may lead to a lower level of self-observer agreement on ratings of Agreeableness (Danheiser & Graziano, 1982;White & Gerstein, 1987).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…In other words, observers were not particularly proficient in gauging the level of Agreeableness of those who are high in self-monitoring. Therefore, our results are consistent with previous studies showing that high self-monitors are driven by social rewards such that they exhibit different levels of Agreeableness-diagnostic behaviors in response to situational demands, which may lead to a lower level of self-observer agreement on ratings of Agreeableness (Danheiser & Graziano, 1982;White & Gerstein, 1987).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Such people tend to be especially influenced by the negative consequences of helping others in certain situations (Karakashian, Walter, Christopher & Lucas, 2006;Kulik & Taylor, 1981;White & Gerstein, 1987) and are less likely to report ethical violations due to concerns about retaliation from others (Fuller et al, 2007;Miceli & Near, 1992;Premeaux & Bedeian, 2003). Thus, high self-monitors may be highly sensitive to the costs of resisting destructive leaders and likely to alter their behavior to avoid the costs of not going along (Kellerman, 2004;Padilla et al, 2007).…”
Section: Self-monitoringmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In contrast, Ashton and Lee () and Nguyen, Ogunfowora, and Bourdage () found that self‐monitoring was negatively correlated with “dark‐side” traits, including all facets of honesty–humility (sincerity, modesty, fairness, lack of greed). Similarly, several studies have found that high self‐monitors are less likely to be cooperative with others if they believe that they will not personally benefit from a cooperative effort (Danheiser & Graziano, ; Snyder & Simpson, ; White & Gerstein, ).…”
Section: Self‐monitoring At Workmentioning
confidence: 99%