2010
DOI: 10.1037/a0021164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Helpful and hindering events in psychotherapy: A practice research network study.

Abstract: This paper presents the findings of a psychotherapy process study conducted within the Pennsylvania Psychological Association Practice Research Network (PPA-PRN). The investigation was the product of a long-term collaborative effort, both in terms of the study design and implementation, between experienced clinicians of various theoretical orientations and full-time psychotherapy researchers. Based on a relatively large sample of clients seen in independent practice settings, close to 1,500 therapeutic events … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
91
0
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(62 reference statements)
4
91
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The Pennsylvania Practice Research Network (PPRN; Borkovec et al 2001) was started by a clinical researcher and a clinical practitioner in the 1990s and was initially supported by funding from the APA and the Pennsylvania Psychological Association. To date, this PBRN has conducted two studies examining therapist and client characteristics, client progress during outpatient therapy, and specific events within therapy that are helpful or hindering to client progress (Borkovec et al2001; Ruiz et al 2004; Castonguay et al 2007) and is preparing to launch a third examining the impact of providing session-by-session feedback to therapists about the techniques their clients find most helpful (Parry et al2009). Therapists and Researchers: Advancing Collaboration (TRAC) is a practice research network that began in 2003 as a therapist advisory group to help guide the development and execution of a specific practice-based research study of usual care practices for children with disruptive behavior problems (Garland et al 2006).…”
Section: Pbrns Within Mental Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Pennsylvania Practice Research Network (PPRN; Borkovec et al 2001) was started by a clinical researcher and a clinical practitioner in the 1990s and was initially supported by funding from the APA and the Pennsylvania Psychological Association. To date, this PBRN has conducted two studies examining therapist and client characteristics, client progress during outpatient therapy, and specific events within therapy that are helpful or hindering to client progress (Borkovec et al2001; Ruiz et al 2004; Castonguay et al 2007) and is preparing to launch a third examining the impact of providing session-by-session feedback to therapists about the techniques their clients find most helpful (Parry et al2009). Therapists and Researchers: Advancing Collaboration (TRAC) is a practice research network that began in 2003 as a therapist advisory group to help guide the development and execution of a specific practice-based research study of usual care practices for children with disruptive behavior problems (Garland et al 2006).…”
Section: Pbrns Within Mental Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Castonguay and colleagues (2013) provide an extensive review of PRN research conducted around the world, including the Pennsylvania Psychotherapy PracticeResearch Network (Castonguay, Boswell et al, 2010;Castonguay, Nelson et al, 2010). PRN research tends to be organized around common practice settings like university clinics, specific disorders like substance abuse, or professional organisations (Castonguay et al, 2013).…”
Section: Psychotherapy Prns: a Solution To The Practiceresearch Gap?mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Large-scale pragmatic trials (Goodyer 2011) also offer a methodology in harmony with Ryle's original research ambitions for CAT. Practice-research networks (Castonguay 2010) would also enable the rapid development of large-scale data-sets, given the increasing and enduring popularity of CAT in routine clinical practice. Use of the CCAT in future CAT RCTs is an essential component for benchmarking the integrity of the CAT delivered.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Evidence Basementioning
confidence: 99%