2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Help on the road: Effects of vehicle manual consultation in driving performance across modalities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Voice command contributed to the decrease of tracking error and the increase of of time at the appropriate distance, which verified Hypothesis 4 (see Figures 5 and 6). This result corresponds well with Owens et al [27], Miller et al [28], and Alvarez et al [29] that verified the effectiveness of voice command under a dual-task condition. On the other hand, voice command did not further contribute to quick and accurate responses to target cars on the road (see Figure 7 and 8) except for the data that the reaction time on the left side was higher when the GUI task was performed with voice command than when it was performed manually.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Voice command contributed to the decrease of tracking error and the increase of of time at the appropriate distance, which verified Hypothesis 4 (see Figures 5 and 6). This result corresponds well with Owens et al [27], Miller et al [28], and Alvarez et al [29] that verified the effectiveness of voice command under a dual-task condition. On the other hand, voice command did not further contribute to quick and accurate responses to target cars on the road (see Figure 7 and 8) except for the data that the reaction time on the left side was higher when the GUI task was performed with voice command than when it was performed manually.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Therefore, we anticipate that voice command results in improvements in efficiency of the main driving task in a multi-task situation. This hypothesis is also supported by past findings [24,[26][27][28][29][30] that voice commands were effective under a multi-task situation. Therefore, it is expected that avoidance of response modality competition between manual input to a GUI task and manual tracking, manual distance maintenance and manual response to target cars enhances performances of tracking, distance maintenance, and response to target cars on the road and contributes to the improvement of the three tasks related to driving (Hypothesis 4).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The interaction of the user with the system must take into account the driving context. Obviously, focusing the user's attention on a visual element only, whether it is shown on a Head-Up Display (HUD) or on a Head-Down Display (HDD), while driving is not the most appropriate [47]. For this reason, another element of interaction with the driver is defined based on sound alerts.…”
Section: Review Of Interfaces and Usabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the user has to consult a manual while driving, the workload increases significantly, and the driving performance decreases. The management of the ADAS should not require the use of a manual, or in any case, help should be offered through a voice interface [47]. In 2011, Audi engineers, in cooperation with scientists at the Technische Universitaet Muenchen developed what they called an Avatar-based Virtual Co-driver System (AviCoS), with the main purpose of replacing the manual text, instead delivering it to the driver using an assistant that is more user-friendly and intuitive to use [54].…”
Section: Review Of Interfaces and Usabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%