1995
DOI: 10.1515/mamm.1995.59.3.427
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Helminths as biological tags for franciscana (Pontoporia blainvillei) (Cetacea, Pontoporiidae) in Argentinian and Uruguayan waters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the former field of knowledge mentioned, diet was more similar among individuals inhabiting adjacent areas of Rio Grande do Sul and Uruguay (see Pinedo, 1982;Pinedo et al, 1989;Ott, 1994;Bassoi, 1997;Danilewicz et al, 2002) than between these two areas and Argentina (Rodríguez et al, 2002). With reference to parasites, Andrade et al (2000) stated that the distribution pattern of gastrointestinal helminths in franciscana was similar among individuals sampled in Rio Grande do Sul and Uruguay, while Aznar et al (1995) comparing the helminthofauna of franciscana between samples from Uruguay and Argentina observed differences in dominance and infection levels by the acanthocephalan worm Polymorphus cetaceum, the nematode Anisakis simplex, as well as by the trematode Hadwenius pontoporiae.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the former field of knowledge mentioned, diet was more similar among individuals inhabiting adjacent areas of Rio Grande do Sul and Uruguay (see Pinedo, 1982;Pinedo et al, 1989;Ott, 1994;Bassoi, 1997;Danilewicz et al, 2002) than between these two areas and Argentina (Rodríguez et al, 2002). With reference to parasites, Andrade et al (2000) stated that the distribution pattern of gastrointestinal helminths in franciscana was similar among individuals sampled in Rio Grande do Sul and Uruguay, while Aznar et al (1995) comparing the helminthofauna of franciscana between samples from Uruguay and Argentina observed differences in dominance and infection levels by the acanthocephalan worm Polymorphus cetaceum, the nematode Anisakis simplex, as well as by the trematode Hadwenius pontoporiae.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diet was found to be more similar between animals inhabiting areas in Rio Grande and Uruguay than between any of these areas and Argentina (Ott 1994;Pinedo 1982;Pinedo et al 1989). Aznar and colleagues (Aznar et al 1994(Aznar et al , 1995 and Andrade and colleagues (Andrade et al 2000) showed that parasite infection levels in franciscana dolphins from Rio Grande and Uruguay are significantly different to those sampled in Argentina.…”
Section: Isolation By Distance?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four types of data are particularly relevant and could be used in combined analyses of population structure: (i) Oceanographic data may serve to construct a priori hypotheses regarding the placement of subpopulation boundaries for genetic analyses or to corroborate evidence of genetic structure, since environmental variables such as depth and temperature may have importance in the development of ecological niches (Hoelzel 1998;Natoli et al 2005). (ii) Ecological partitioning, derived from satellite telemetry data, parasite and contamination loads or feeding habits, may provide evidence of shallow population structure related to dispersal and movement patterns (Andrade et al 2000;Aznar et al 1994Aznar et al , 1995Bordino and Wells 2005;Ott 1994;Pinedo 1982;Pinedoet al 1989). (iii) Morphological characters served to propose and or define cetacean stocks and populations, and have been typically used before molecular techniques were commonly available (Messenger and McGuire 1998;Pinedo 1991;Rosenbaum et al 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparisons of infection levels of one or more species of parasites among host groups within a given geographic area can aid in the identification of populations that are segregated, potentially comprising different ecological stocks (e.g. Szidat, 1964;MacKenzie, 1987;Dailey and Vogelbein, 1991;Moser, 1991;Aznar et al, 1995;Balbuena et al, 1995;Aznar et al, 1997a, Walker, 2001). The use of such information as a tool to examine the stock structure of the franciscana has already been recommended (Reeves and Leatherwood, 1994;IBAMA, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%