1979
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3115(79)90333-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Helium effects in ion-bombarded 304 stainless steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our case, since the level of vacancy concentration due to the He implantation is rather negligible (especially compared with the vacancies induced by the heavy ions), it is more likely that the difference arises from the former hypothesis that helium is continuously absorbed by pre-existing bubbles during the dual-beam irradiations. The temperature effect suggested by [21] needs further investigation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our case, since the level of vacancy concentration due to the He implantation is rather negligible (especially compared with the vacancies induced by the heavy ions), it is more likely that the difference arises from the former hypothesis that helium is continuously absorbed by pre-existing bubbles during the dual-beam irradiations. The temperature effect suggested by [21] needs further investigation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…There have also been experiments done on 304 SS comparing dual-beam and preimplanted cases of 200 appm helium, with three study cases (i) pre-implantation at 25 °C, (ii) pre-implantation at temperature (650, 700 and 750 °C), and (iii) dual-beam irradiation (at 80 He appm/dpa) with 28 MeV Si 6+ to a dose of ~40 dpa [21,22]. They observed that dual-beam irradiation led to an average bubble size smaller than for the pre-implantation at temperature but larger than for the case of pre-implantation at room temperature, indicating an effect of the preimplantation temperature [21]. The number densities had the opposite trends.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the early years, it was widely estimated that helium effects on phase transformation are minor because it is chemically inert. However, later studies on stainless steels have subsequently shown that helium causes obvious changes to phase segregation and precipitation, such as Laves, G and η phases [26,29,30]. Nevertheless, there is no any data showing helium effects on phase changes in Ni alloys, whether helium affects the irradiation-induced disordering of Ni 3 (Al, Ti) γ' precipitates in Inconel X-750.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Helium is known to play a role in the development of the irradiated microstructure with modifications to cavities [4][5][6][7][8], dislocations [9][10][11], and secondary phases [12][13][14][15][16]. Previous studies on the effects of helium using ion irradiation have used either pre-implanted or co-injected helium.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%