Introduction: Helium is known to reduce airway resistance and improve ventilatory physiology. Helium also has a high CO 2 diffusion coefficient. Thus, CO 2 diffusion occurs faster in a helium gas mixture than in air or oxygen. Helium-oxygen mixture has been used with mechanical ventilator settings such as conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) or high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV). Although helium-oxygen mixture was shown to promote CO 2 excretion in combination with either CMV or HFOV, it has not been examined which ventilatory mode is more effective in promoting CO 2 excretion when used with helium-oxygen mixture. This study aimed to compare the changes of arterial partial pressure of CO 2 (PaCO 2 ) by using helium-oxygen mixture between CMV and HFOV. Methods: Six Japanese white rabbits were used, and following tracheostomy, they were connected to the ventilator. A control PaCO 2 between 40 and 70 mmHg was maintained before administration of helium-oxygen mixture, and blood gas analysis was performed during and after administration of helium-oxygen mixture. The 2-way type repeated measures analysis of variance was used for comparison of PaCO 2 , and it was followed by post hoc tests. Simple pairwise comparisons were performed for oxygenation at each time points between under CMV and HFOV. Results: There was a statistical significance for the differences of time points (P-value<0.000001) as well as for the interaction term (P-value<0.001). According to the post hoc tests, under HFOV, PaCO 2 during administration of helium-oxygen mixture was significantly lower compared to both before and after administration. In intergroup comparison, PaCO 2 during helium-oxygen inhalation under HFOV was significantly lower than that under CMV. Arterial partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspiratory oxygen ratio during administration under HFOV was significantly higher than that under CMV. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that ventilatory management of healthy lung rabbits with helium-oxygen mixture results in more efficient ventilation and better oxygenation with piston-driven HFOV than with CMV.