The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2010.11.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heliostat field layout optimization for high-temperature solar thermochemical processing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
49
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it should be borne in mind that the type of geometry used in the construction of the reflective surface of a heliostat has a significant influence on the shape and size of the image generated in the plane of the receiver, and therefore on the energy density and the amount of energy intercepted by this element [42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it should be borne in mind that the type of geometry used in the construction of the reflective surface of a heliostat has a significant influence on the shape and size of the image generated in the plane of the receiver, and therefore on the energy density and the amount of energy intercepted by this element [42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It seems clear that global optimization methods are a suitable solution to investigate this kind of issue. Other work on SPT optimization has already analysed this possibility (Pitz-Paal et al, 2011), (Ramos and Ramos, 2012), (Carrizosa et al, 2015). This Monte Carlo based direct model is then coupled with a particle swarm optimizer (PSO) in order to achieve SPT optimal design.…”
Section: • the Height Of The Tower H Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heliostat fields have been widely researched since the 1970's, with several studies particularly dedicated to the optimization of this subsystem. Among the most recent developments, some interesting articles can be mentionned: (Pitz-Paal et al, 2011), (Carrizosa et al, 2015), (Wei et al, 2007), (Zhang et al, 2016) and (Ramos and Ramos, 2012) focuse on SPT optimization notably with global optimization methods ; (Noone et al, 2012), (Yao et al, 2015) and (Zhang et al, 2016) introduce innovative pattern for heliostat layout (in particular phyllotactic spiral) ; (Sánchez and Romero, 2006) propose a new quantity (yearly normalized energy surfaces) as the reference criterion for heliostat field generation. All the above-mentioned articles are based either on a computation of the power collected at one or more specifically chosen periods of the year, considered to be representative of the central receiver's overall performance, or on an approximation of the yearly performance of the solar plant, obtained by making significant assumptions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to get a suitable concentration ratio at the receiver aperture, a secondary concentrator is placed to increase the flux density of the radiation. A compound parabolic concentrator (CPC) has demonstrated high performance in this kind of processes (Pitz-Paal et al, 2011). Gallagher and Winston, 1983).…”
Section: System Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%