2005
DOI: 10.1029/2005ja011250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heliospheric modulation of cosmic rays: Monthly reconstruction for 1951–2004

Abstract: [1] The differential energy spectrum of galactic cosmic rays in the vicinity of the Earth can be parameterized by the so-called force field model which has only one parameter, the modulation potential f, for a given local interstellar spectrum. Here we present the series of monthly values of the modulation potential f since February 1951, reconstructed using the data from the worldwide neutron monitor network and calibrated with precise balloon and space-borne direct measurements of cosmic ray energy spectrum.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
448
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 394 publications
(459 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
9
448
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The cosmic-ray flux modulation at Earth is frequently described by the force field model with a single empirical parameter, the force field potential Φ [36][37][38]. The value of Φ can be extracted from precision ground-based neutron observations [39][40][41]. We obtain the corresponding values for our observation period by averaging over the monthly values.…”
Section: E Time Variation Of the Solar-disk Fluxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cosmic-ray flux modulation at Earth is frequently described by the force field model with a single empirical parameter, the force field potential Φ [36][37][38]. The value of Φ can be extracted from precision ground-based neutron observations [39][40][41]. We obtain the corresponding values for our observation period by averaging over the monthly values.…”
Section: E Time Variation Of the Solar-disk Fluxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exact value of the modulation potential is not important since it can be defined only relatively, depending on the primary assumption on the local interstellar spectrum (LIS) so that the same GCR spectrum near Earth can be parametrized by different values of φ for different LIS assumptions (Usoskin et al 2005;Herbst et al 2010). However, once the LIS is fixed, the value of φ unambiguously determines the GCR energy spectrum.…”
Section: The Heliospheric Modulation Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spectrum of Galactic cosmic rays (GCR) near Earth can be described by the force-field parametrization using a single parameter, called the modulation potential (Gleeson & Axford 1968;Castagnoli & Lal 1980;Usoskin et al 2005), which depends on the level of solar magnetic activity. One of the main heliospheric parameters, affecting the modulation potential, φ, is the OSF.…”
Section: The Heliospheric Modulation Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The largest source of uncertainty in the modeled count rate is likely the chosen modulation parameter, which can be uncertain by up to ±100 MV (Usoskin et al, 2005;Wiedenbeck et al, 2009) depending on how it is determined. This uncertainty can easily account for differences of up to 25%.…”
Section: Appendix B Validation Of the Neutron Transport Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%