2017
DOI: 10.1177/0954410017741329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Helicopter gas turbine engine performance analysis: A multivariable approach

Abstract: Helicopter performance relies heavily on the available output power of the engine(s) installed. A simplistic single-variable analysis approach is often used within the flight-testing community to reduce raw flight-test data in order to predict the available output power under different atmospheric conditions. This simplistic analysis approach often results in unrealistic predictions. This paper proposes a novel method for analyzing flight-test data of a helicopter gas turbine engine. The so-called "Multivariab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main advantages to analyzing data using MPOC models over the single-variable method are: (1) it gives the ability to determine the relative influence of one or more predictor variables to the criterion value; (2) it has the ability to identify outliers, or anomalies; and (3) it gives a superior estimation precision. As demonstrated in Arush and Pavel, 8 MPOC could provide a more accurate engine power estimation (in some cases of more than 300% when compared to the single-variable method). However, the main weakness of the MPOC method is that it struggles with a large number of possible multivariable polynomials (more exactly 512 polynomials) to choose from and there are no guidelines herein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The main advantages to analyzing data using MPOC models over the single-variable method are: (1) it gives the ability to determine the relative influence of one or more predictor variables to the criterion value; (2) it has the ability to identify outliers, or anomalies; and (3) it gives a superior estimation precision. As demonstrated in Arush and Pavel, 8 MPOC could provide a more accurate engine power estimation (in some cases of more than 300% when compared to the single-variable method). However, the main weakness of the MPOC method is that it struggles with a large number of possible multivariable polynomials (more exactly 512 polynomials) to choose from and there are no guidelines herein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Such a multivariable approach applied to engine analysis results in a more accurate and realistic available power prediction as it contains the intrinsic couplings between all engine variables. Reference Arush and Pavel 8 demonstrates that the empirical model for the engine output power (equation (4)) should rely on a basic model, superimposed with any possible combination of nine regressors (f 1 –f 9 ) as listed in Table 2. The basic model, referred to as model 1 and denoted hereinafter as CSHP M(1) , is a third-order multivariable polynomial in all engine variables given as equation (5).…”
Section: Helicopter Gas-turbine Engine Flight-testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations