2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2006.11.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Helicoidal vortex model for wind turbine aeroelastic simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to better model the wake dynamics of wind turbine rotors, the vortex model [50], in which the trailing and shed vorticity in the wake are represented by lifting lines or surfaces, has also found applications in the aeroelastic models of wind turbine blades. Fig.…”
Section: Vortex Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to better model the wake dynamics of wind turbine rotors, the vortex model [50], in which the trailing and shed vorticity in the wake are represented by lifting lines or surfaces, has also found applications in the aeroelastic models of wind turbine blades. Fig.…”
Section: Vortex Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thickness can be included through source elements but they are of second-order effects on lift and has shown to be negligible when computing loads (Bergami, Gaunaa, & Heinz, 2013). In order to enable the solution to be written in a linear statespace representation, the wake is prescribed in a helicoidal shape (Chattot, 2007) as shown in Figure 2. The chordwise length of the shed wake vortex rings from trailing-edge is U ∞ × ∆t, where the relative freestream velocity U ∞ varies linearly along the span of the blade.…”
Section: State-space Vortex Unsteady Aerodynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the aerodynamics model, vortex panels are placed on the outer 80% span of the blade and a helicoidal wake profile 42 is prescribed to enable a linear UVLM representation, as shown in Figure 7. The inboard segment of the blade with cylindrical cross-sections is not modeled here but can be included as additional drag forces.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%