2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.11.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Helicase Subunit Cdc45 Targets the Checkpoint Kinase Rad53 to Both Replication Initiation and Elongation Complexes after Fork Stalling

Abstract: Summary Across eukaryotes, disruption of DNA replication causes an S phase checkpoint response, which regulates multiple processes, including inhibition of replication initiation and fork stabilization. How these events are coordinated remains poorly understood. Here, we show that the replicative helicase component Cdc45 targets the checkpoint kinase Rad53 to distinct replication complexes in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Rad53 binds to forkhead-associated (FHA)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(92 reference statements)
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, even in the absence of SML1, Rad53 mutants are exquisitely sensitive to chemical agents that damage DNA or stall DNA replication forks (Allen et al, 1994;Sanchez et al, 1999;Gunjan & Verreault, 2003). This sensitivity to DNA damaging agents has been primarily attributed to Rad53's role in stabilizing and restarting stalled replication forks (reviewed in detail here: Segurado & Tercero, 2009 (Can et al, 2018). Identification of additional key substrates and recruiting mechanisms will be necessary to deconstruct Rad53's functions in maintaining fork stability, which may involve a range of redundant phosphorylation events in more than one essential replisome protein.…”
Section: Of 21mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nonetheless, even in the absence of SML1, Rad53 mutants are exquisitely sensitive to chemical agents that damage DNA or stall DNA replication forks (Allen et al, 1994;Sanchez et al, 1999;Gunjan & Verreault, 2003). This sensitivity to DNA damaging agents has been primarily attributed to Rad53's role in stabilizing and restarting stalled replication forks (reviewed in detail here: Segurado & Tercero, 2009 (Can et al, 2018). Identification of additional key substrates and recruiting mechanisms will be necessary to deconstruct Rad53's functions in maintaining fork stability, which may involve a range of redundant phosphorylation events in more than one essential replisome protein.…”
Section: Of 21mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, precisely how DNA damage signaling maintains replication fork integrity is unknown and represents a fundamental knowledge gap in the field. Recent work has revealed that Rad53 phosphorylates the replicative helicase component Cdc45, which in turn recruits and stabilizes Rad53 at replication complexes (Can et al , ). Identification of additional key substrates and recruiting mechanisms will be necessary to deconstruct Rad53's functions in maintaining fork stability, which may involve a range of redundant phosphorylation events in more than one essential replisome protein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, chromosome maintenance requires that DNA synthesis, chromosome cohesion establishment and the ability to activate the S phase checkpoint must occur simultaneously at the replication fork. Strikingly deletions of a single component of the replisome often can cause considerable defects in DNA synthesis, in chromosome cohesion (Borges et al ., 2013) and activation of the S phase checkpoint kinase Rad53 in response to fork stalling (Alcasabas et al ., 2001; Can et al ., 2019), thus highlighting how DNA synthesis is closely intertwined with other processes necessary for the maintenance of genome stability. The replicative factor Ctf18-Dcc1-Ctf8-Rfc2-5 complex (Ctf18-RFC) exemplifies these overlapping functions at forks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ChIP-seq was performed as previously described (Can et al 2019). Antibodies for IP were anti-H2A (39945, Actif motif), IgG (AB27478, Abcam), or anti-γH2A (AB15083, Abcam) or anti-GFP (3h9, Chromotek).…”
Section: Chromatin Immunoprecipitation-sequencing (Chip-seq)mentioning
confidence: 99%