1993
DOI: 10.1086/172809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Helical jets and the misalignment distribution for core-dominated radio sources

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
105
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
105
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using R > 27, βapp = 1.1, jet structural parameter p = 3 (for a continuous jet), and the relations listed in the Appendix of Urry & Padovani (1995), we derive an upper limit of θj 48 degrees. This result is consistent with the inclination estimated by Tingay et al (2000), who derived the jet inclination in a different manner, using the jet deflection model for a bent jet following Conway & Murphy (1993), finding an upper limit of θj < 51 • . Another estimate by Wilson et al (2001), incorporating projection relations from the radio maps of Perley et al (1997) …”
Section: Inclination Of the Radio Jetsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Using R > 27, βapp = 1.1, jet structural parameter p = 3 (for a continuous jet), and the relations listed in the Appendix of Urry & Padovani (1995), we derive an upper limit of θj 48 degrees. This result is consistent with the inclination estimated by Tingay et al (2000), who derived the jet inclination in a different manner, using the jet deflection model for a bent jet following Conway & Murphy (1993), finding an upper limit of θj < 51 • . Another estimate by Wilson et al (2001), incorporating projection relations from the radio maps of Perley et al (1997) …”
Section: Inclination Of the Radio Jetsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Small intrinsic changes can therefore appear as large-angle misalignments between the jet axes observed on parsec and kiloparsec scales. Indeed, large-angle misalignments have been observed in some core-dominated radio sources (e.g., 3C 309.1; Wilkinson et al 1986), and the distribution of jet misalignment angles has been extensively studied (e.g., Pearson & Readhead 1988;Wehrle et al 1992;Conway & Murphy 1993;Appl, Sol, & Vicente 1996). While the distribution is known to have a bimodal shape, with a main peak of misalignment angles near 0 and a secondary peak near 90 (Pearson & Readhead 1988;Conway & Murphy 1993), misalignment angles larger than 120 are quite rare.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cores are identified based on compactness, flat radio spectra, and strong flux density variability. Stronger misalignment between the parsec-scale and the kiloparsec-scale jets have been found for BL Lac objects compared to quasars (Conway & Murphy, 1993). No clear counter-jets have been found in core-dominated, i.e., presumably strongly boosted sources, but counter-jets are seen in some lobe-dominated objects, e.g., Cygnus A and 3C 84.…”
Section: Imaging Of Luminous Objectsmentioning
confidence: 90%