2014
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.90.012330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heisenberg versus standard scaling in quantum metrology with Markov generated states and monitored environment

Abstract: Finding optimal and noise robust probe states is a key problem in quantum metrology. In this paper we propose Markov dynamics as a possible mechanism for generating such states, and show how the Heisenberg scaling emerges for systems with multiple "dynamical phases" (stationary states), and noiseless channels. We model noisy channels by coupling the Markov output to "environment" ancillas, and consider the scenario where the environment is monitored to increase the quantum Fisher information of the output. In … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…input states. On the other hand, Markov chains with several ergodic components may fail to satisfy local asymptotic normality, and even exhibit 'Heisenberg scaling', with relevance for quantum metrology applications [7]. Our theory intersects here with that of 'thermodynamics of trajectories' and 'dynamical phase transitions' [31,32], and this connection will be further explored in a future work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…input states. On the other hand, Markov chains with several ergodic components may fail to satisfy local asymptotic normality, and even exhibit 'Heisenberg scaling', with relevance for quantum metrology applications [7]. Our theory intersects here with that of 'thermodynamics of trajectories' and 'dynamical phase transitions' [31,32], and this connection will be further explored in a future work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…One can then define an effective QFI, which poses the ultimate bounds for these kinds of estimation strategies [39,48,51], and that depends both on the specific unravelling and on the monitoring efficiencies η j :…”
Section: Quantum Estimation Via Timecontinuous Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly this bound can be readily applied to the timecontinuous case discussed in the main text, where the vector of outcomes y T corresponds to a measured homodyne photocurrent, and where the conditional state We should also remark that a bound of this kind has already been considered in [39], in a similar physical situation where n probes, that may be prepared in a quantum correlated initial state, are coupled to n independent environments and one performs sequentially n measurement on the respective environments and a final measurement on the conditional state of the probes.…”
Section: Appendix A: Classical and Quantum Cramér-rao Bounds For Sequmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal is to recover the information on the parameter leaking into the environment and simultaneously to exploit the back action of the measurement to drive the system * francesco.albarelli@unimi.it † matteo.rossi@unimi.it ‡ matteo.paris@fisica.unimi.it § marco.genoni@fisica.unimi.it into more sensitive conditional states [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. This approach has received much attention recently [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42] also in the context of quantum magnetometry [43][44][45][46][47][48].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%