2010
DOI: 10.4310/mrl.2010.v17.n3.a4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heisenberg idempotents on unipotent groups

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So X is invertible, and since X ⊗ X ∼ = X , we see that X ∼ = 1, proving the lemma. [15,Lemma 1.4], the -equivariantization M 0 is equivalent to M. By [15,Theorem 1.3], M 0 is also a fusion category, so we see that e L is the only simple object of M 0 (indeed, every simple object of M 0 can be realized as a direct summand of a simple object of M 0 ). On the other hand, all simple objects of M 0 are described in [15, §4.1], and that description implies that U is connected and that ϕ L is an isomorphism.…”
Section: Remarks 84 (1)mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…So X is invertible, and since X ⊗ X ∼ = X , we see that X ∼ = 1, proving the lemma. [15,Lemma 1.4], the -equivariantization M 0 is equivalent to M. By [15,Theorem 1.3], M 0 is also a fusion category, so we see that e L is the only simple object of M 0 (indeed, every simple object of M 0 can be realized as a direct summand of a simple object of M 0 ). On the other hand, all simple objects of M 0 are described in [15, §4.1], and that description implies that U is connected and that ϕ L is an isomorphism.…”
Section: Remarks 84 (1)mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…One can show that the converse of Proposition 8.1(c) holds as well (see [15]), but we do not need this fact.…”
Section: Remark 82mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This associativity constraint is not quite canonical, however this does not matter in the proof of the next lemma. Moreover, note that by [De1] each eD U (U a) is the bounded derived category of a finite semisimple abelian category and D is equivalent to the bounded derived category of a fusion category.…”
Section: Tanmay Deshpandementioning
confidence: 99%
“…are (infinite) spherical braided Z-crossed category with trivial components eD G (G) and M G,e respectively with a (rigid) duality functor which we denote by (·) ∨ (cf. [De1,§2.3]) and a natural isomorphism (·) ∨∨ ∼ = id of monoidal functors. In particular, for each M ∈ eD F G (G) we have a twist θ F,e M defined as the composition…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%