2002
DOI: 10.1063/1.1472159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HeII co-current two phase flow at high vapor velocities

Abstract: In the framework of LHC studies, we have performed several experiments on He II co-current two-phase flow. It was found that for high vapor velocities, the heat exchange capacity between the He II flow and the pipe wall is significantly better than what can be accounted for by the liquid to wall interface of a stratified two-phase flow pattern. This seems to indicate a transition from a pure stratified two-phase flow into either a partially annular two-phase flow or a stratified two-phase flow including liquid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Beyond some threshold, which depends on the droplets mist density, all the incident droplets will be directly evaporated, and no liquid film will form. The walls temperature is thus expected to vary non linearly with the heat applied, in qualitative agreement with our earlier observations [6,8]. This phenomenon limits the ability of atomization to improve thermal exchange, but in a way which, as discussed in §3, would be extremely difficult to predict theoretically.…”
Section: Motivationssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Beyond some threshold, which depends on the droplets mist density, all the incident droplets will be directly evaporated, and no liquid film will form. The walls temperature is thus expected to vary non linearly with the heat applied, in qualitative agreement with our earlier observations [6,8]. This phenomenon limits the ability of atomization to improve thermal exchange, but in a way which, as discussed in §3, would be extremely difficult to predict theoretically.…”
Section: Motivationssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Indeed, atomization is driven by the vapor kinetic energy density, which scales as W 2 line /ρ v , hence decreases with increasing temperature. This explains why atomization of normal liquid could not be obtained in the first experiments [8] with an injected liquid mass flow rate of 7 g/s (correspond-ing to a maximal W line =150 W). This was one of the motivations [23] for increasing this mass flow up to 20 g/s in the present experiments, allowing to compare the heat transfer for superfluid and normal helium in similar conditions of atomization [24,25].…”
Section: Flow Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This part of the paper describes the optical techniques we used to detect liquid droplets in the helium two phase flow in the Cryoloop experiment 16) . These include quantitative light scattering, imaging, and laser phase sensitive anemometry and granulometry (PDPA).…”
Section: Heii Co-current Two-phase Flow Visualization On a 10 M Long mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FIGURE 2 represents a typical cooldown from 4.5 K to 1.9 K with 10 g/s liquid helium cooling flow in the bayonet heat exchanger. The cooling flow rate, and therefore the speed of the cooldown, is limited to 7.8 g/s by hydrodynamics [4]: liquid entrainment at vapor flow rates above about 7.5 m/s (or 7.8 g/s at 1.8 K saturation pressure) in the bayonet heat exchanger prevents its proper functioning. Too much liquid traverses the full heat exchanger length without having had the possibility to exchange heat at the heat exchanger walls.…”
Section: Operational Performancesmentioning
confidence: 99%