2000
DOI: 10.1006/exeh.2000.0743
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heights of Men and Women in 19th-Century Bavaria: Economic, Nutritional, and Disease Influences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
69
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
69
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In many aspects, the results of the foregoing analysis agree with what Johnson and Nicholas (1997) and also Baten and Murray (2000) have found. Johnson and Nicholas came to the conclusion that women who were born in the English countryside between 1815 and approximately 1840 were, in general, taller than women originating from the English urban areas.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In many aspects, the results of the foregoing analysis agree with what Johnson and Nicholas (1997) and also Baten and Murray (2000) have found. Johnson and Nicholas came to the conclusion that women who were born in the English countryside between 1815 and approximately 1840 were, in general, taller than women originating from the English urban areas.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…Therefore, compared with prisoners in Bavaria, England or Ireland, they were rather tall. They were between 0.5 and 0.7 cm taller than detainees in Bavaria and from 1.5 to 2.5 cm taller than detainees with an English or Irish background (Baten & Murray, 2000, fig. 6.11).…”
Section: Social and Anthropometric Characteristics Of Adult Detaineesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We approach the biological well being of the American population in the 20 th century from the perspective afforded by anthropometric indicators in the hope of illuminating socio-economic processes that might otherwise elude even the informed observer (Baten 2000;Baten and Murray 2000;Komlos and Baten 1998;Mielcke 2000;Steckel 1995). We confine our analysis to physical stature and the body mass index 1 (bmi) in order to document a major transformation in the physical shape (morphology) of the American population in the 20 th century.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that there is a correlation, if not a simple one, between male and female heights is now beyond dispute (Baten and Murray, 2000;Moradi and Guntupalli, 2014), which justifies our substituting one set for another when necessary. Objections to this strategy might be raised by those who accept the female-resiliency hypothesis, which holds that for biological reasons the average height of a given female population is more resistant to adverse conditions than is the average height of their male counterparts.…”
Section: Data Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%