Abstract:Subject recruitment for epidemiologic studies is associated with major challenges due to privacy laws now common in many countries. Privacy policies regarding recruitment methods vary tremendously across institutions, partly because of a paucity of information about what methods are acceptable to potential subjects. The authors report the utility of an opt-out method without prior physician notification for recruiting community-dwelling US women aged 65 years or older with incident breast cancer in 2003. Parti… Show more
“…34 However, these efforts are struggling with equally strong trends toward strict confidentiality of medical record information. 48 Even if these national databases become available to investigators in the US, they may lack historical depth or may be limited to specific age groups (eg, Medicare generally covers only patients aged Ն65 years). In contrast, the REP system covers a complete population of approximately 500,000 persons of all ages residing in a well-defined geographic region (Olmsted County), has existed for almost half a century, and includes electronic indices for diagnostic codes, surgical procedures, and drug prescriptions.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Medical Information Systemsmentioning
The Rochester Epidemiology Project (REP) has maintained a comprehensive medical records linkage system for nearly half a century for almost all persons residing in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Herein, we provide a brief history of the REP before and after 1966, the year in which the REP was officially established. The key protagonists before 1966 were Henry Plummer, Mabel Root, and Joseph Berkson, who developed a medical records linkage system at Mayo Clinic. In 1966, Leonard Kurland established collaborative agreements with other local health care providers (hospitals, physician groups, and clinics [primarily Olmsted Medical Center]) to develop a medical records linkage system that covered the entire population of Olmsted County, and he obtained funding from the National Institutes of Health to support the new system. In 1997, L. Joseph Melton III addressed emerging concerns about the confidentiality of medical record information by introducing a broad patient research authorization as per Minnesota state law. We describe how the key protagonists of the REP have responded to challenges posed by evolving medical knowledge, information technology, and public expectation and policy. In addition, we provide a general description of the system; discuss issues of data quality, reliability, and validity; describe the research team structure; provide information about funding; and compare the REP with other medical information systems. The REP can serve as a model for the development of similar research infrastructures in the United States and worldwide.
“…34 However, these efforts are struggling with equally strong trends toward strict confidentiality of medical record information. 48 Even if these national databases become available to investigators in the US, they may lack historical depth or may be limited to specific age groups (eg, Medicare generally covers only patients aged Ն65 years). In contrast, the REP system covers a complete population of approximately 500,000 persons of all ages residing in a well-defined geographic region (Olmsted County), has existed for almost half a century, and includes electronic indices for diagnostic codes, surgical procedures, and drug prescriptions.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Medical Information Systemsmentioning
The Rochester Epidemiology Project (REP) has maintained a comprehensive medical records linkage system for nearly half a century for almost all persons residing in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Herein, we provide a brief history of the REP before and after 1966, the year in which the REP was officially established. The key protagonists before 1966 were Henry Plummer, Mabel Root, and Joseph Berkson, who developed a medical records linkage system at Mayo Clinic. In 1966, Leonard Kurland established collaborative agreements with other local health care providers (hospitals, physician groups, and clinics [primarily Olmsted Medical Center]) to develop a medical records linkage system that covered the entire population of Olmsted County, and he obtained funding from the National Institutes of Health to support the new system. In 1997, L. Joseph Melton III addressed emerging concerns about the confidentiality of medical record information by introducing a broad patient research authorization as per Minnesota state law. We describe how the key protagonists of the REP have responded to challenges posed by evolving medical knowledge, information technology, and public expectation and policy. In addition, we provide a general description of the system; discuss issues of data quality, reliability, and validity; describe the research team structure; provide information about funding; and compare the REP with other medical information systems. The REP can serve as a model for the development of similar research infrastructures in the United States and worldwide.
“…In addition, the relatively recent privacy laws that now limit access to electronic health records would have made this challenging as well. The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, which is a law that aims to protect the privacy of health system patients and the confidentiality of their data, often (real or perceived) prevents epidemiologists from accessing health system records for use as sample frames [36]. Given unfortunate violations, it is perhaps understandable that restrictions can be severe when actual medical record data (i.e., private health information) are sought.…”
“…[15] Further, in the context of case-control studies of cancer where the sampling frame usually differs between case and control series, poorly or incorrectly defined eligibility criteria for cases and controls could cause an unpredictable level of selection bias even when reported response rates are high.…”
Purpose:We assessed the quality of reporting of response rates in published case-control studies of cancer over the past four decades. Methods: We reviewed all case-control studies of cancer published in twelve major epidemiology, public health, and general medicine journals in four publication periods (1984-86, 1995, 2005, and 2013). Information on study base ascertainment, data collection methods, population characteristics, response rates, and reasons for non-participation was extracted. Quality of response rate reporting was assessed based on the amount of pertinent information reported, and in particular, numbers of non-participants by reasons for non-participation. We calculated subject response rates by quality of response rate reporting. Results: A total of 370 studies met the eligibility criteria, yielding a total of 370 case series and 422 control series. Overall, the quality of reporting of response rate and reasons for non-participation was poor. There was a tendency for better quality of reporting of case series, followed by population control series, and lastly by medical source control series. Quality of reporting declined from 1995 to 2013. Conclusion: The reporting of relevant information on response rates in case-control studies of cancer has been rather poor, and it has not improved over time. This compromises our ability to assess validity of studies' findings.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.