Height, weight and BMI percentiles and nutritional status relative to the international growth references among Pakistani school-aged children

Abstract

BackgroundChild growth is internationally recognized as an important indicator of nutritional status and health in populations. This study was aimed to compare age- and gender-specific height, weight and BMI percentiles and nutritional status relative to the international growth references among Pakistani school-aged children.MethodsA population-based study was conducted with a multistage cluster sample of 1860 children aged five to twelve years in Lahore, Pakistan. Smoothed height, weight and BMI percentile curves were obtained and comparison was made with the World Health Organization 2007 (WHO) and United States' Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2000 (USCDC) references. Over- and under-nutrition were defined according to the WHO and USCDC references, and the International Obesity Task Force (IOTF) cut-offs. Simple descriptive statistics were used and statistical significance was considered at P < 0.05.ResultsHeight, weight and BMI percentiles increased with age among both boys and girls, and both had approximately the same height and a lower weight and BMI as compared to the WHO and USCDC references. Mean differences from zero for height-, weight- and BMI-for-age z score values relative to the WHO and USCDC references were significant (P < 0.001). Means of height-for-age (present study: 0.00, WHO: -0.19, USCDC: -0.24), weight-for-age (present study: 0.00, WHO: -0.22, USCDC: -0.48) and BMI-for-age (present study: 0.00, WHO: -0.32, USCDC: -0.53) z score values relative to the WHO reference were closer to zero and the present study as compared to the USCDC reference. Mean differences between weight-for-age (0.19, 95% CI 0.10-0.30) and BMI-for-age (0.21, 95% CI 0.11-0.30) z scores relative to the WHO and USCDC references were significant. Over-nutrition estimates were higher (P < 0.001) by the WHO reference as compared to the USCDC reference (17% vs. 15% overweight and 7.5% vs. 4% obesity) while underweight and thinness/wasting were lower (P < 0.001) by the WHO reference as compared to the USCDC reference (7% vs. 12% underweight and 10% vs. 13% thinness). Significantly lower overweight (8%) and obesity (5%) prevalence and higher thinness grade one prevalence (19%) was seen with use of the IOTF cut-offs as compared to the WHO and USCDC references. Mean difference between height-for-age z scores and difference in stunting prevalence relative to the WHO and USCDC references was not significant.ConclusionPakistani school-aged children significantly differed from the WHO and USCDC references. However, z score means relative to the WHO reference were closer to zero and the present study as compared to the USCDC reference. Overweight and obesity were significantly higher while underweight and thinness/wasting were significantly lower relative to the WHO reference as compared to the USCDC reference and the IOTF cut-offs. New growth charts for Pakistani children based on a nationally representative sample should be developed. Nevertheless, shifting to use of the 2007 WHO child growth reference might have importan...

Comparison of Different Internationally Accepted Reference Standards to Measure Childhood Adiposity Rates in Latvia

“…Previous studies reported significant differences between international reference standards in various populations (Shields and Tremblay, 2010;Fetuga et al, 2011;Twells and Newhook, 2011;Mushtaq et al, 2012), and comparison of international reference standards with local reference standard also has found significant differences (Cerrillo et al, 2012).…”

Anthropometric indices among schoolchildren from a municipality in Southern Brazil: a descriptive analysis using the LMS method

“…24 Third, all studies were selected because they used the same physical growth indicator, they used the same anatomical point, and they adopted the same statistician procedure (LMS method) for the construction of percentile values. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] These similarities were important to able the inter-study comparison. Finally, this study selected children from different regions (urban and rural) and school systems (public and private) from colombo.…”

“…BMI percentile values were compared with data from WHO, 15 US center for Disease control and Prevention, 16 Pakistan, 20 India 13 and germany. 17 Wc percentile values were compared with data from germany, 18 Pakistan, 14 Mexico, 11 Hong Kong 19 and India.…”

“…[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] These curves apply the LMS method, a statistical procedure for more robust estimation of percentiles values, especially if the physical growth variables do not have a symmetrical distribution in the population. 21,22 Some studies also used the LMS method to compare body mass and height percentiles from Brazilian children with those of other countries.…”

The Prevalence of Obesity in First Year Primary School Students in Nine Districts of İzmir Province

“…Çocuklarda yaş ilerledikçe obezite artmaktadır [2]. Çocukların beslenme ve sağlık durumlarının değerlendirilmesinde kullanılan yaşa göre ağırlık ve boy ölçümle-ri en güvenilir göstergelerdendir [3,4]. Yaşa göre ağırlık, iki yaş altı çocuklarda, ağırlık kaybını ve beslenme şeklinin değişmesini en erken gösteren göstergedir [5].…”