2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2004.03.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Height to withers and abdominal circumference effects on diets of grazing goats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In practice, various methods were used to study the diet selection and they can be generally divided into two broad types: 1) methods directly connected with animals such as the analysis of fecal and rumen contents (Homolka & Heroldová 1992;Heroldová 1996;Mellado et al 2004), esophageal fistulation (Henley et al 2001;Woji & Iji 1996) and direct observations of grazing animals (Dumont & Boissy 2000); or, alternatively, 2) methods based on vegetation such as the measurement of sward height (Correl et al 2003;Barthram et al 2005), biomass sampling of grazed plots and ungrazed control (Lepš et al 1995) or direct estimation of grazing damage caused by bites upon individual plant species on the pasture (Bílek et al 2000;Stroh et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, various methods were used to study the diet selection and they can be generally divided into two broad types: 1) methods directly connected with animals such as the analysis of fecal and rumen contents (Homolka & Heroldová 1992;Heroldová 1996;Mellado et al 2004), esophageal fistulation (Henley et al 2001;Woji & Iji 1996) and direct observations of grazing animals (Dumont & Boissy 2000); or, alternatively, 2) methods based on vegetation such as the measurement of sward height (Correl et al 2003;Barthram et al 2005), biomass sampling of grazed plots and ungrazed control (Lepš et al 1995) or direct estimation of grazing damage caused by bites upon individual plant species on the pasture (Bílek et al 2000;Stroh et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the high CP and low fiber of this forb, as well as the high preference of this forage by grazing goats (Mellado et al 2004b), it can be typified as ''good-quality'' forage at the flowering stage. The CP level of S. angustifolia reported in this study is similar to levels reported for various other forbs in this type of landscape (Box et al 1967;Schweitzer et al 1993).…”
Section: Chemical Composition Of Foragesmentioning
confidence: 99%