2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2020.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Height of turbulent non-premixed jet flames at elevated pressure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Guiberti, Boyette, and Roberts [4] explore the Delitcharsios' model to obtain the flame height for subsonic jet flames at elevated pressure. The results show that the Delitcharsios' model predicts well around 20% of the flame height in these cases, so a range of two empirical constants are suggested to improve the predictions of the flame height equation.…”
Section: Jet Fire Geometrical Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guiberti, Boyette, and Roberts [4] explore the Delitcharsios' model to obtain the flame height for subsonic jet flames at elevated pressure. The results show that the Delitcharsios' model predicts well around 20% of the flame height in these cases, so a range of two empirical constants are suggested to improve the predictions of the flame height equation.…”
Section: Jet Fire Geometrical Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, different radiation and turbulence models, along with CFD simulations, were explored by Kashi and Bahoosh [12] to evaluate how firewalls or equipment around the flame can affect the radiation distribution and temperature profile of the jet fire. The Delichatsios' model was explored by Guiberti et al [9] to obtain the flame height for subsonic jet flames at elevated pressure; however, this model by itself predicts well around 20% of the flame height in these cases. Mashhadimoslem et al [19] explored two Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) to estimate the jet flame lengths and widths based on the mass flow rates and the nozzle diameters.…”
Section: Risk Assessment and Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%