1970
DOI: 10.1016/0003-9969(70)90157-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Height and shape of the palate in girls: A longitudinal study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
6
1

Year Published

1981
1981
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
3
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Findings in this study do not indicate an ethnic difference in relation to palatal height and width, although in a previous study such a difference was recorded in the maxillary arch dimensions (Younes, 1984). In agreement with other research reports there was a trend towards an increased palatal index from childhood to adulthood (Ashley-Montagu, 1934;Shapiro, Redman & Gorlin, 1963;Knott & Johnson, 1970). At level 1 the palatal index was significantly increased from the primary to mixed and permanent dentitions.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Findings in this study do not indicate an ethnic difference in relation to palatal height and width, although in a previous study such a difference was recorded in the maxillary arch dimensions (Younes, 1984). In agreement with other research reports there was a trend towards an increased palatal index from childhood to adulthood (Ashley-Montagu, 1934;Shapiro, Redman & Gorlin, 1963;Knott & Johnson, 1970). At level 1 the palatal index was significantly increased from the primary to mixed and permanent dentitions.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In a cohort of patients older than 21 years and free of periodontal disease, this study showed that the available connective tissue graft dimensions that could be obtained from the palatal donor site are large enough to allow a safe withdrawal in a high percentage of patients. Our results are concordant with those reported by Redman et al, 9 who found a mean height of 14.9 ± 2.93 mm in men and 12.7 ± 2.45 mm in women, but differ from those of other studies 10 , 11 . These discrepancies may be explained by differences in location at which the measurements were performed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Despite using the landmarks proposed by Reiser et al 6 for localizing the GPA at the junction of the vertical and horizontal walls of the hard palatal vault, we concluded that it is still possible to withdraw a 5‐mm‐high connective tissue graft in 100% of the cases and an 8‐mm‐high connective tissue graft in 93% of the cases in the premolar area. Previous studies 8 , 11‐13 investigating masticatory mucosal thickness had shown that the palatal root of the first molar represented an anatomic barrier in graft harvesting. In our study, the canine exhibited the smallest height.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…P.I.) In other reports (5,6,8,10) palatal measurements were not taken as far anteriorly as in this study. In the present study it was found that at Level 1 the P.I.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The palatometer, which has been used by several investigators (8-10) has the advantage of being usable on both live subjects and casts. It has been stated that greatest palatal height is found anterior to the first molars (5). In this study the profile gauge or template (4) was used for measuring palatal height because it was inexpensive and quick to use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%