1989
DOI: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(89)79407-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heifer Fertility and Its Relationship with Cow Fertility and Production Traits in Holstein Dairy Cattle

Abstract: Breeding receipts from three AI units were merged with Ontario Dairy Herd Improvement Corporation and Record of Performance production records. Data comprised 53,705 heifer, 41,253 lactation 1, 14,688 lactation 2, and 3054 lactation 3 records by daughters of 2150 sires represented in 15,877 herd-year-seasons of birth. Three measures of heifer fertility, three measures of cow fertility, and three measures of production were investigated. Measures of heifer fertility were ages at first and last breeding and numb… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
27
2
3

Year Published

1995
1995
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
9
27
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Estimate was lower for LS2 than for LS1. Heritability estimate for AFI was close to estimates by Peura et al (2004b) for blue foxes, and close to estimates by Raheja et al (1989) and Muir et al (2004) for dairy cattle. On the other hand, Hanenberg et al (2001) had higher estimates for sows (0.32).…”
Section: Discussion Genetic Parameterssupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Estimate was lower for LS2 than for LS1. Heritability estimate for AFI was close to estimates by Peura et al (2004b) for blue foxes, and close to estimates by Raheja et al (1989) and Muir et al (2004) for dairy cattle. On the other hand, Hanenberg et al (2001) had higher estimates for sows (0.32).…”
Section: Discussion Genetic Parameterssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Peura et al (2004b) estimated heritability of AFI to be between 0.16 and 0.18 for blue foxes. For pigs and dairy cattle, heritability of AFI ranges between 0.11 and 0.32 (Raheja et al 1989, Hanenberg et al 2001, Muir et al 2004. In pig production and in dairy milk production, the main selection goal is to achieve economic benefit by shorter farrowing or calving interval.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In figure 1 it can be observed that the magnitude of the month effect is very intense for all cattle categories; however, it would be evident that this environmental stress was twice as high for heifers and first calving females as for the rest of the cows. In fact, this behavior is contradictory in the literature (Thatcher, 1974;Thatcher et According to our results it was clear that the h 2 for different fertility traits were low (< 5%) and similar to many reports on this subject (see review of Men6ndez Buxadera, 1993); however, the genetic variability (table IV) was higher than most of the results in the literature (see Janson, 1980;Berger et al, 1981;Raheja et al, 1989 for SG and Baptist and Gravert, 1973;Janson, 1980;Jansen, 1986 (1981), Hansen et al (1983), Jansen (1986) and Strandberg and Danell (1988) who obtained a small increase in h 2 and CVg in older females. For the rest of the traits it was evident that these genetic parameters were higher in the first two stages (heifer and first calving), which is in correspondence to Van Raden et al (1987), Raheja et al (1989) and Weller (1989 (Janson, 1980;Distl, 1982;Jansen, 1986) …”
contrasting
confidence: 54%
“…Moreover, fertility of both dairy heifers and cows has declined over the last 10 years (Barbat et al, 2005). For some authors they are correlated and for others they are independent (Raheja et al, 1989). Even though fertility is generally higher in heifers than in cows, rearing management can highly influence heifers' fertility.…”
Section: For a Successful First Calvingmentioning
confidence: 99%