2015
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.150496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heidelberg-mCT-Analyzer: a novel method for standardized microcomputed-tomography-guided evaluation of scaffold properties in bone and tissue research

Abstract: Bone tissue engineering and bone scaffold development represent two challenging fields in orthopaedic research. Micro-computed tomography (mCT) allows non-invasive measurement of these scaffolds’ properties in vivo. However, the lack of standardized mCT analysis protocols and, therefore, the protocols’ user-dependency make interpretation of the reported results difficult. To overcome these issues in scaffold research, we introduce the Heidelberg-mCT-Analyzer. For evaluation of our technique, we built 10 bone-i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(85 reference statements)
0
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For hBMSC-seeded scaffolds, changes for SS remained on the same level, independent from the stimulating dose. The amount of rPN in PN decreased for RIA0 and RIA1; only small changes were detectable in BM1 and RIA0.1 7 : bone ingrowth fills the smallest pores completely with bone. This means that they ''disappear'' in T1 whereas they are counted in T0.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For hBMSC-seeded scaffolds, changes for SS remained on the same level, independent from the stimulating dose. The amount of rPN in PN decreased for RIA0 and RIA1; only small changes were detectable in BM1 and RIA0.1 7 : bone ingrowth fills the smallest pores completely with bone. This means that they ''disappear'' in T1 whereas they are counted in T0.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,17 Furthermore, b-TCP-granules should be replaced by either solid b-TCP-scaffolds to provide a more standardized model or alternative bone substitutes like bioactive glasses, which can be tested within the experimental model described. 7,18 Another promising way to stimulate bone formation clinically could be the use of the patient's own plateletrich plasma (PRP), containing a physiological mix of a lot of growth and differentiation factors. 19 PRP could be a promising alternative to commercially available recombinant differentiation factors, especially in combination with new bone scaffold substitutes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations