2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.soscij.2005.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heideggerian existentialism and social work practice with death and survivor bereavement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Because time is the ultimate horizon of our being, it ultimately means that we are the beings which pass, and therefore death is of fundamental concern. As such, death is a phenomenon of life for Heidegger (Kominkiewicz, 2006;Jirasek & Veselesky, 2013). Because death haunts life as such, it means that anxiety is also a principle mode of our existing in a world.…”
Section: Phenomenologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Because time is the ultimate horizon of our being, it ultimately means that we are the beings which pass, and therefore death is of fundamental concern. As such, death is a phenomenon of life for Heidegger (Kominkiewicz, 2006;Jirasek & Veselesky, 2013). Because death haunts life as such, it means that anxiety is also a principle mode of our existing in a world.…”
Section: Phenomenologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To think of service users in a dispositional sense, or beingaffected in innumerable ways, will allow the social worker to gain an illuminated sense of who they are engaging with, what matters to said individuals, as well as a sense of the possibilities that are latent in their current situation. (Kominkiewicz, 2006;Jirasek & Veselesky, 2013).…”
Section: Phenomenologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Heidegger's thought features rarely in the social work literature and where it does there is a tendency for it to be focused around authenticity as being-toward death (Jira´sek and Veselesky, 2013;Kominkiewicz, 2006). This fundamental ontology of Heidegger's argues that only man knows and cares about his own mortality and therefore can be the only creature said to have being in the world or Dasein.…”
Section: Heidegger's Phenomenologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kominkiewicz (2006: 48), varoluşçu düşünürlerden Heidegger'in varoluş felsefesini ele aldığı makalesinde, Heidegger'in varoluşçu görüşünün kuramsal temellerinin sosyal hizmet literatüründe çok az yer aldığını belirtmektedir. Bunun yanında, varoluşçu yaklaşıma dayalı uygulamaların sosyal hizmet alanlarında başarılı bir şekilde ele alındığını belirten Kominkiewicz (2006), felçli hastaların sağaltımında (Nilsson, Jansson ve Norberg, 1999), klinik sosyal hizmet uygulamasında (Klugman, 1997), adölesanlarla gerçekleştirilen çalışmalarda (Chessick, 1996;Hacker, 1994), yaşlılara yönelik sosyal hizmet uygulamalarında (Brown ve Romanchuk, 1994), aile tedavisinde (Boylin ve Briggie, 1987;Haldane ve McCluskey, 1982;Kaye, 1986;Lantz, 1987;Lantz ve Kondrat, 1997), evli çiftlerle yapılan uygulamalarda (Lantz, 1999), çocuk istismarında (Brown, 1980), sosyal hizmet süpervizyonunda (Walsh, 1999), madde kullananların sağaltımında (Ford, 1996), savaş gazileri ile gerçekleştirilen çalışmalarda (Lantz, 1991;Lantz ve Greenlee, 1990) ve sosyal hizmet eğitiminde (Dean ve Fenby, 1989;Peebles ve Suval, 1983) kullanıldığını belirtmektedir. Fraternali (1998: 65), varoluşçuluğa psikoloji ve psikoterapide oldukça fazla yer verilirken (Frankl, 2009;Yalom, 1980;May, 1961), sosyal hizmetin varoluşçu anlayıştan özellikle kaçındığını belirtmektedir.…”
Section: Varoluş Felsefeleri̇ Ve Sosyal Hi̇zmetunclassified