2013
DOI: 10.1177/0952695113500973
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heidegger’s influence on posthumanism

Abstract: While Jacques Derrida’s influence on posthumanist theory is well established in the literature, given Martin Heidegger’s influence on Derrida, it is surprising to find that Heidegger’s relationship to posthumanist theory has been largely ignored. This article starts to fill this lacuna by showing that Heidegger’s writings not only influences but also has much to teach posthumanism, especially regarding the relationship between humanism and posthumanism. By first engaging with Heidegger’s destruction of metaphy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, Heidegger offers terms I use for the description of phenomena like a communicating lake ("call"), the deep concern of the inhabitants ("care") or the depressed mood awakened by the lake-problem ("Stimmung"). Referring to Heidegger in my study on the posthuman is by no means arbitrary, since his theory is compatible with posthumanist approaches (Ferrando 2019;Rae 2014). With the destruction of metaphysics, Heidegger turns against binary oppositions and anthropocentrism -both aspects are central determinants of the posthuman -and avoids the Cartesian dualism by conceptualizing being as immersed in the world, what he expresses by the concept of being-in-the-world.…”
Section: The Posthuman As Call Care and Stimmungmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Accordingly, Heidegger offers terms I use for the description of phenomena like a communicating lake ("call"), the deep concern of the inhabitants ("care") or the depressed mood awakened by the lake-problem ("Stimmung"). Referring to Heidegger in my study on the posthuman is by no means arbitrary, since his theory is compatible with posthumanist approaches (Ferrando 2019;Rae 2014). With the destruction of metaphysics, Heidegger turns against binary oppositions and anthropocentrism -both aspects are central determinants of the posthuman -and avoids the Cartesian dualism by conceptualizing being as immersed in the world, what he expresses by the concept of being-in-the-world.…”
Section: The Posthuman As Call Care and Stimmungmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Wolfe (2010) 14 describes the ultimate destination of the logic of this trajectory. This formless, posthuman being, in fact, continues the trajectory of multiple, fluid, and networked identities begun in Heidegger's reversal of anthropocentrism and being (Rae, 2014) and…”
Section: Techne Models Of Emotions Are Processual and Indiscriminatementioning
confidence: 94%
“…In affective neuroscience, however, constructivist modeling is acutely influenced by the technological evolution that accompanies neuroscientific conceptions, and that now underwrites an epistemological substitution of techne for episteme. Evidenced symptomatically in the influence of artificial intelligence (AI), affective artefacts, these constructivist models inform an ontological incursion of techne seen to coincide with posthumanist aspirations and anthropology (Rae, 2014;Onishi, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of a techno-vigilant ethics of care would better prepare those of us in the field of health care to respond to, or at least reflect upon, issues emerging around HET. First, it would make it possible to question new regimes of truth related to HET by allowing us to dispose of both the instrumental vision of technology and the human/nonhuman binary interpretation derived from anthropocentrism (Rae, 2014). This would encourage the deconstruction of techno-scientific arguments claiming that human enhancement is simply a beneficial tool for humanity, despite the fact that it is currently very difficult to anticipate the consequences of these technologies on human existence.…”
Section: Towards a Criti C Al Phenomenology Of He Tmentioning
confidence: 99%