Heidegger on Being and Acting: From Principles to Anarchy

Postanarchizm. Źródła, konteksty, następstwa

“…Schürmann pisze o an-archiczności, działaniu pozbawionym wymogu metafi zycznej prawomocności i ugruntowania w zasadzie -arché. W tym heideggerowskim rozpoznaniu otwartości, czy jak może należałoby powiedzieć, ek-statyczności, metafi zyki i umieszczeniu działania w tu-oto 39 Newman znajduje ontologiczne oparcie dla koncepcji postanarchizmu. W innym miejscu Newman pisze, że ontologiczny anarchizm oznacza uzmysłowienie sobie, że anarchia nie jest żadnym politycznym celem ostatecznym, punktem dojścia, lecz punktem, w którym się zaczyna:…”

Epilogue: turning around the right to look

“…Our contemporary representatives of representation, such as isomorphic cultures of globalized fiscalization, securitization and militarization, possess the capability, not only to install authoritative representations, but to determine the criteria of representability underwritten by omnivoyant truth claims as the ‘natural’ coming about of what is to be dominated. Reiner Schürmann (1990: 276) identifies the complicity between such appropriative representation and the optics of targeting: ‘As an act of conceiving ( begriefen ) representation already amounts to an act of attacking ( angriefen ).’ Jacques Derrida (1978: 113) similarly recalls ‘the ancient clandestine friendship between light [ lumière ] and power [ puissance ], the ancient complicity between theoretical objectivity and technico-political possession’. Schürmann (2003: 12) associates such optical-epistemic claims to maximality with hyperbolic reason wherein ‘It (is) necessary to train reason in finitude, a task to be taken up ever anew.’ Computational-algorithmic and militarized omnivoyance are optical and mathematical sovereignties in being positioned as the law of laws:The law of laws is fantasmic because it does not yield to any prehension and evades comprehension; we cannot possess it.…”