1991
DOI: 10.1080/00335639109383950
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heidegger and derrida: The conflict between hermeneutics and deconstruction in the context of rhetorical and communication theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Humans do not disclose truth which would force the aletheic process to lean on the agentic side as truth-finding. Rather, the process of disclosure is presented with the employment of middle voice as a ‘bringing forth from concealment’, that is as a self-subsistent process that is neither fully motivated by beings, nor imposed onto beings by some sort of transcendental entity, as Being (also see Heidegger 1972 , p. 8; Desilet 1991 on the translation of ‘es gibt’ as ‘it gives’). In fact, as Derrida contends, it is questionable whether Being is anything else than an “ontic metaphor struggling in vain to become ontological conceptuality” (Krell 2015 , p. 90).…”
Section: Key Concepts In Heidegger’s Fundamental Ontologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Humans do not disclose truth which would force the aletheic process to lean on the agentic side as truth-finding. Rather, the process of disclosure is presented with the employment of middle voice as a ‘bringing forth from concealment’, that is as a self-subsistent process that is neither fully motivated by beings, nor imposed onto beings by some sort of transcendental entity, as Being (also see Heidegger 1972 , p. 8; Desilet 1991 on the translation of ‘es gibt’ as ‘it gives’). In fact, as Derrida contends, it is questionable whether Being is anything else than an “ontic metaphor struggling in vain to become ontological conceptuality” (Krell 2015 , p. 90).…”
Section: Key Concepts In Heidegger’s Fundamental Ontologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Humans do not disclose truth which would force the aletheic process to lean on the agentic side as truthfinding. Rather, the process of disclosure is presented with the employment of middle voice as a 'bringing forth from concealment', that is as a self-subsistent process that is neither fully motivated by beings, nor imposed onto beings by some sort of transcendental entity, as Being (also see Heidegger 1972, p. 8;Desilet 1991 on the translation of 'es gibt' as 'it gives'). In fact, as Derrida contends, it is questionable whether Being is anything else than an "ontic metaphor struggling in vain to become ontological conceptuality" (Krell 2015, p. 90).…”
Section: Key Concepts In Heidegger's Fundamental Ontologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…His main idea is a strong dislike of emphasized structure in everyday life, and he argued that symbols are enough to expose the truth and ideology, so the whole structure of an object pales in comparison with the research of the individual. According to Martin Heidegger, an eminent philosopher, philosophy at that time represented metaphysics, and the history of western philosophy was related to the history of metaphysics that said when an object or a quality can be seen, it is defined as existing [4]. The word "logos" defined that behind everything, there is only truth saying in a word that contains the great power or a representation of God.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%