2018
DOI: 10.15195/v5.a32
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hegemonic Gender Norms and the Gender Gap in Achievement: The Case of Asian Americans

Abstract: Many argue that hegemonic gender norms depress boys' performance and account for the gender gap in achievement. I describe differences in the emergence of the gender gap in academic achievement between white and Asian American youth and explore how the immigrant experience and cultural differences in gender expectations might account for observed differences. For white students, boys are already underperforming girls in kindergarten, with the male disadvantage growing into high school. For Asian Americans, boy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
24
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(53 reference statements)
3
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Other scholars have noted that though, for girls, hard work and conscientiousness in school is seen as desirable (Connell and Messerschmidt, 2005), such behavior is inconsistent with a “cool” masculinity characterized by dominance, strength, and “effortless achievement” (Epstein, 1998; Archer et al ., 2001). Hsin (2018) provides an interesting case in an analysis of the achievement trajectories of white and Asian‐American schoolchildren. White boys underperform white girls as early as kindergarten, but Asian‐American boys do not begin to fall behind girls in school achievement until adolescence.…”
Section: Boys and Girls In Schoolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other scholars have noted that though, for girls, hard work and conscientiousness in school is seen as desirable (Connell and Messerschmidt, 2005), such behavior is inconsistent with a “cool” masculinity characterized by dominance, strength, and “effortless achievement” (Epstein, 1998; Archer et al ., 2001). Hsin (2018) provides an interesting case in an analysis of the achievement trajectories of white and Asian‐American schoolchildren. White boys underperform white girls as early as kindergarten, but Asian‐American boys do not begin to fall behind girls in school achievement until adolescence.…”
Section: Boys and Girls In Schoolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, Asian American youth may benefit academically from the tendency to be stereotyped as academically talented ("stereotype promise") as well as having less rigid conceptions of masculinity among Asian Americans more generally. Even so, Hsin (2018) finds that these protective factors erode during adolescence, such that Asian American boys underperform relative to their female counterparts in high school.…”
Section: Intersectionality and Gender Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the extent that emphasized feminine behaviors are associated with lower GPAs, the relationship may be particularly strong among girls of lower socioeconomic status. Other research finds that among Asian Americans, traditional gender norms lead to high parental expectations and the tendency of immigrant parents to exert greater control over their daughters than their sons and these behaviors are beneficial to girls' academic performance (Qin 2009;Hsin 2018). Thus, girls and boys may practice gender differently depending on their location within the stratification hierarchy, and these differences may be related to their academic achievement.…”
Section: Intersectionality and Gender Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From an intersectional perspective, the child's gender does not influence children's lived experiences in isolation from other categories of social position (Hsin 2018). Hence, gender differences in academic achievement may depend on and manifest in conjunction with other status characteristics of the child and the family.…”
Section: Children's Academic Achievement and Behavior Problems At Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas there is abundant literature on the separate effects of socioeconomic status (SES) (e.g., Bradley and Corwyn 2002;Chmielewski 2019) and gender (e.g., Leahey and Guo 2001;McIntosh et al 2013) on children's academic achievement, "the interaction between gender and SES has attracted much less attention" (Entwisle, Alexander, and Olson 2007, p. 128). Few studies investigated whether gender differences in children's academic and behavioral outcomes differ across SES (DiPrete and Jennings 2012;Entwisle et al 2007;Penner and Paret 2008), family structure (Autor et al 2019;Bertrand and Pan 2013;Lundberg 2017) or race (Catsambis 1994;Fan, Chen, and Matsumoto 1997;Fryer and Levitt 2010;Hsin 2018;Penner and Paret 2008). However, none of these studies investigated whether gender disparities in academic outcomes and behavior develop differently across childhood depending on the family circumstances.…”
Section: Children's Academic Achievement and Behavior Problems At Thementioning
confidence: 99%