2016
DOI: 10.1038/srep21322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hedonic sensitivity to low-dose ketamine is modulated by gonadal hormones in a sex-dependent manner

Abstract: We recently reported a greater sensitivity of female rats to rapid antidepressant-like effects of ketamine compared to male rats, and that ovarian-derived estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P4) are essential for this response. However, to what extent testosterone may also contribute, and whether duration of response to ketamine is modulated in a sex- and hormone-dependent manner remains unclear. To explore this, we systematically investigated the influence of testosterone, estradiol and progesterone on initiatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
55
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
5
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When challenged with 5 mg/kg ketamine, females previously exposed to repeated treatments with both 2.5 and 5 mg/kg ketamine displayed a significant increase in locomotor movements compared to those previously treated with saline (Sidak’s multiple comparison, p= 0.029 and p=0.013, respectively). Interestingly, females sensitized to both 2.5 and 5 mg/kg, whereas males only sensitized to 5 mg/kg, which could reflect greater sensitivity of females to the drug than males, a result supported by previous reports from our lab (Carrier and Kabbaj, 2013; Saland et al , 2016). …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When challenged with 5 mg/kg ketamine, females previously exposed to repeated treatments with both 2.5 and 5 mg/kg ketamine displayed a significant increase in locomotor movements compared to those previously treated with saline (Sidak’s multiple comparison, p= 0.029 and p=0.013, respectively). Interestingly, females sensitized to both 2.5 and 5 mg/kg, whereas males only sensitized to 5 mg/kg, which could reflect greater sensitivity of females to the drug than males, a result supported by previous reports from our lab (Carrier and Kabbaj, 2013; Saland et al , 2016). …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Vaginal cytology was examined via vaginal lavage on a daily basis during the first 3-hr of the light cycle in order to track female rats’ estrous cycles as previously described (Becker et al , 2005; Saland et al , 2016). All female rats were tested in diestrous 1 (D1), when both progesterone and estrogen levels are low to ensure that fluctuating hormones are not interfering with behavioral data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because our pharmacological and behavioral manipulations occurred over a long period of time, we did not track the estrous cycle in our study in order to minimize handling stress. However, ovarian hormones can significantly impact neuronal morphology, rodent behavior, and (R,S)-ketamine efficacy (51)(52)(53). Our results support the hypothesis that ovarian hormones induce changes at the neuronal level to causally mediate (R,S)ketamine and (2R,6R)-HNK's effects, whether antidepressant or prophylactic, and thus, impact behavior in females.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Upon arrival, rats were double-housed in 43 × 21.5 × 25.5-cm Plexiglas cages on a 12/12-h reverse light/dark cycle, and food and water were provided ad libitum except during behavioral testing. After a period of 5–6 days of acclimation, females underwent daily vaginal lavage to determine stage of estrous cycle, for two complete cycles before behavioral testing (Becker et al 2005; Saland et al 2016). Once cyclicity was established, lavage was carried out every day, no more than 2 h before behavioral testing.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once cyclicity was established, lavage was carried out every day, no more than 2 h before behavioral testing. Stage of cycle was based on microscopic observation of cell morphology and abundance, as we have previously described (Saland et al 2016; Stack et al 2010). Males were handled daily.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%