2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1088-4963.2005.00038.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hedonic Psychology and the Ambiguities of "Welfare"

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In general terms, welfarism is seen to focus on well-being, understood in terms of preference-satisfaction or happiness, while extrawelfarism is seen to adopt a broader conception of the quality of life that may include elements such as health, social relations, and the realisation of other "capabilities." A debate is also taking place between preference-based approaches to policy and "happiness-based" approaches (Kelman, 2005;Adler and Posner, 2007;Dolan and Kahneman, 2008). A preference-based approach allows an individual's utility function to contain mental states and also arguments that may be distinct from mental states, such as health and income.…”
Section: Different Lives Surveys and Accounts Of Well-beingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general terms, welfarism is seen to focus on well-being, understood in terms of preference-satisfaction or happiness, while extrawelfarism is seen to adopt a broader conception of the quality of life that may include elements such as health, social relations, and the realisation of other "capabilities." A debate is also taking place between preference-based approaches to policy and "happiness-based" approaches (Kelman, 2005;Adler and Posner, 2007;Dolan and Kahneman, 2008). A preference-based approach allows an individual's utility function to contain mental states and also arguments that may be distinct from mental states, such as health and income.…”
Section: Different Lives Surveys and Accounts Of Well-beingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding concerns the focus and quality of the measurement, not necessarily the stability, uniqueness or good judgement of the perception that is measured. Kelman (2005) casts doubt on 'the whole notion . .…”
Section: The Language Of 'Subjective Versus Objective' Measures Of Wementioning
confidence: 99%
“…140-156). 4 An excellent account of the ambiguities of welfare in the context of economics and hedonic psychology is provided in Kelman (2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%