2000
DOI: 10.1111/0002-9092.00011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hedonic Prices for Fish: Tuna Prices in Hawaii

Abstract: Over the past two decades, the marketing of fish has recognized the importance of quality. Yet empirical analysis of market transactions could give us little insight into the value of different qualities of fish because market data are typically aggregated. We exploit a dataset on the auction price of tuna sold in Hawaii to estimate a hedonic model. The model provides empirical estimates of price increments due to species, quality of the fish such as size or fat content, method of handling, and market conditio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
73
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
73
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach has been used to quantify the value of various seafood product attributes at the landing point (McConnell and Strand, 2000), the wholesale level (Asche and Guillen, 2012) and the retail level (Roheim, Asche and Insignaris, 2011;SognGrundvåg, Larsen and Young, 2013). These studies typically estimate a single parameter for each product attribute.…”
Section: Model Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This approach has been used to quantify the value of various seafood product attributes at the landing point (McConnell and Strand, 2000), the wholesale level (Asche and Guillen, 2012) and the retail level (Roheim, Asche and Insignaris, 2011;SognGrundvåg, Larsen and Young, 2013). These studies typically estimate a single parameter for each product attribute.…”
Section: Model Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…restricting the use of destructive fishing gear) raises questions about whose behavior the label purports to change and how the premium is transmitted to these agents. 4 Different fishing vessels often receive different prices for the fish that they land even in the absence of certification (McConnell and Strand 2000;Lee, 2014;Asche, Chen, and Smith 2015). Given the individual basis of fish prices and the collective nature of certification, it is unclear how a premium can be transmitted to individual vessels, how they would perceive the premium, and how it maintains incentives at the individual vessel (firm) level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the revealed preference literature, hedonic price models [8,41,42,12,27], demand system [47] and case study [39] approaches have been used to estimate relative values for seafood product attributes such as catch method, fishing gear choice, country of origin, product color (of salmon), and environmental sustainability. The two articles most relevant to our paper are Roheim et al [41] applying an hedonic price function approach to scanner data on the sale of frozen, processed Alaskan Pollock in the London metropolitan market to estimate a statistically significant price premium for Marine Stewardship Council certification, and…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Gardner and Brooks (1994), Baulch (1997), Meyer (2004), Asche, Jaffry and Hartmann (2007) and McConnell and Strand (2000) analyzed the prices linkage between geographically separated markets. Gardner and Brooks (1994) examined whether there exists a price relationship among geographically separated food markets in Russia using a cointegration test.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Asche, Jaffry and Hartmann (2007) analyzed market integration and supply chain linkages for the European salmon market. McConnell and Strand (2000) tested the market linkage between Hawaii's and Japan's markets for bigeye tuna and yellowfin tuna. There are also some empirical studies analyzing the inter-species price relationship by using time series ana, including Gordon, Salvanes and Atkins (1993), Bose and McIlgorm (1996), Asche, Bremnes and Wessells (1999) and Jaffry, Pascoe, Taylor and Zabala (2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%