2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.scoms.2014.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hedging in the discourse of central banks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another possible explanation is that this study used the publicly available English version of the CSR reports, while the original language of the CSR reports was Chinese. Therefore, the low percentage of hedges might be attributed to the differences in original languages of the reports examined by our study and by Resche (2015).…”
Section: The Relative Word Frequency Of Hedges In Written Languagementioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another possible explanation is that this study used the publicly available English version of the CSR reports, while the original language of the CSR reports was Chinese. Therefore, the low percentage of hedges might be attributed to the differences in original languages of the reports examined by our study and by Resche (2015).…”
Section: The Relative Word Frequency Of Hedges In Written Languagementioning
confidence: 69%
“…However, this study is comparable in dataset size with that of Resche (2015), who processed 210,915 words. Second, the validity of the quantitative method used by this study can be questioned.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Analysts’ attempts to balance the risk of assessment error, documented in the analyst behavior literature (Fogarty & Rogers, 2005), are visible in their use of implicit evaluation and mitigation strategies aimed at reducing their accountability for a potential error. The notions of mitigation and mitigators have been frequently addressed in the linguistic literature (Caffi, 1999; Fraser, 1980) but are only found in a handful financial communication studies (Crawford Camiciottoli, 2013; Resche, 2015). Mitigation can be seen as a set of communication strategies that allow speakers (understood as language users) to soften or reduce the strength of speech acts whose anticipated negative effects are unwelcome to the hearer and/or the speaker (Fraser, 1980).…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mitigators are defined as pragmalinguistic strategies that allow speakers to soften or reduce the strength of speech acts whose anticipated negative effects are unwelcome to the hearer, and/or to the speaker (Caffi, 1999; Fraser, 1980). This problem has only recently been recognized in the financial communication literature, notably by Crawford Camiciottoli (2013) and Resche (2015), who examine the use of evaluation and hedging devices. We follow this line of research by examining analysts’ use of mitigators and the effect this has on the credibility of their reports.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies look at how monetary policies are disseminated and/or represented in the mass media (cf., Berger, Ehrmann, and Fratzscher ). A few linguistically oriented studies focus on selected stylistic features or rhetorical devices of central bankers' official speeches (cf., Resche , ). Altogether these studies are, regardless of their scholarly rigor, studies “about,” not studies “of,” central bank communication, to allude to the useful ethnomethodological distinction (cf., Garfinkel, Lynch, and Livingston ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%