2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02211.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hedgerow trees and extended‐width field margins enhance macro‐moth diversity: implications for management

Abstract: Summary1. Improving the effectiveness of agri-environment schemes is essential for reversing declines in farmland biodiversity. Crucial to achieving this is identifying management options that are practical and beneficial to biodiversity, and understanding the influence of the surrounding landscape. We used data on abundance and species richness of farmland macro-moths, many of which are declining, and trait-based analyses on their feeding guild, mobility and conservation status, to explore local-and landscape… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
76
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
7
76
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study confirms that light traps have remarkably local sampling ranges, which results in samples highly representative of local conditions, hence contradicting the popular belief that light traps draw in moths from distances of up to 500 m (Bowden & Morris, ; Baker & Sadovy, ; Bowden, ). The increasing need to relate moth samples from light traps with surrounding habitat and landscape characteristics requires better knowledge of the spatial resolution of light traps (Hawes et al ., ; Fuentes‐Montemayor et al ., , ; Merckx et al ., ,b). MRR studies, using light traps positioned across landscapes, are increasingly being used to study macro‐moth movements and dispersal (Nieminen, ; Merckx et al ., , ; Slade et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Our study confirms that light traps have remarkably local sampling ranges, which results in samples highly representative of local conditions, hence contradicting the popular belief that light traps draw in moths from distances of up to 500 m (Bowden & Morris, ; Baker & Sadovy, ; Bowden, ). The increasing need to relate moth samples from light traps with surrounding habitat and landscape characteristics requires better knowledge of the spatial resolution of light traps (Hawes et al ., ; Fuentes‐Montemayor et al ., , ; Merckx et al ., ,b). MRR studies, using light traps positioned across landscapes, are increasingly being used to study macro‐moth movements and dispersal (Nieminen, ; Merckx et al ., , ; Slade et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Apple (Malus x domestica Borkh.) New knowledge on the ecological role of hedgerows with respect to biodiversity conservation or agroecosystem functioning is required to design and implement new policies for the management and protection of these landscape elements (Baudry et al, 2000;Merckx et al, 2012). Consequently, most orchards in the region are focused on cider-apple production .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…data), a macro-moth of which the larvae feed gregariously on blackthorn Prunus spinosa and hawthorn Crataegus sp. In addition, we have recently discovered that the protection of existing hedgerow trees, and the provision of new ones, is likely to be a highly beneficial conservation tool for populations of moths, and probably many other flying insects too, as hedgerow trees provide a sheltered microclimate and other key habitat resources (Merckx et al 2012b). The implementation of hedgerow tree and field margin AES options is likely to provide even better results in areas where farmers are targeted to join AES across the landscape.…”
Section: What About Fertile Agricultural Regions?mentioning
confidence: 99%